Vermont 2015

The Surprising World of Nonprofit Captives

They comprise fully one-quarter of all captives domiciled in Vermont.
By: | April 8, 2015 • 5 min read
04012015_vermont_tipin_noprofit_church_700px

Pamela Davis recalled a conversation she had the other day with someone not familiar with nonprofits. When the individual heard what Davis does, that person asked:

“Do they even need insurance? Do they even have employees?”

“I didn’t even know where to start,” said Davis, the founder, president and CEO of Nonprofits Insurance Alliance Group, a captive reinsurer for nonprofits.

Advertisement




Nonprofits’ operations often expose them to complicated risks, which is why many nonprofits belong to and operate their own insurance companies — captive insurance companies.

More than a quarter of all active captives in Vermont are owned and operated for nonprofits. This is old news to some. Church Mutual Insurance Co., now a fully admitted insurer, traces its roots to a captive conceived of by 10 Lutherans in 1897. Catholics had them beat by a few years when they founded the Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America in 1889, now Catholic Mutual Group.

The Episcopal Church’s current captive dates back to 1913, and the Seventh Day Adventists’ back to 1936. A 20-something-year-old captive like the National Catholic Risk Retention Group Inc. is a neophyte amid this crowd.

Land trusts have flocked to captive insurance as well. Launched in June 2012, the Terrafirma Risk Retention Group LLC now serves 474 land trusts and insures 7.2 million protected acres.

Leslie Ratley-Beach, conservation defense director of Land Trust Alliance

Leslie Ratley-Beach, conservation defense director of Land Trust Alliance

The land trust leaders who organized the captive needed a risk management tool to provide nationwide coverage, to be flexible enough to handle the multiplicity of claims that arise, and to always be there to defend the trust in court. Commercial and traditional insurance didn’t fit the bill.

“The only thing left was captive insurance,” said Leslie Ratley-Beach, conservation defense director of Land Trust Alliance, where she led the establishment of Terrafirma RRG.

A Custom Fit

For Michael J. Bemi, president, CEO and director of National Catholic RRG (who kindly provided that long history of religious captives above), nonprofit organizations seek the same benefits from alternative risk transfer as do for-profits — namely, adequate insurance capacity, quality of coverage in terms of appropriate terms and conditions, and consistency and affordability of premium levels — all over the long haul. On top of that primary list, add the opportunity to gain control over underwriting profits and investment earning, or at least a larger share of them.

The driver for National Catholic when it first formed in 1987, however, was not to derive profits.

“When we formed, the market was a total disaster,” Bemi said.

Davis, whose Nonprofits Insurance Alliance Group consists of three self-insurance entities, recalled the insurance market a quarter-century ago as “complete chaos.”

After surviving numerous hard and soft cycles in the traditional insurance market, captive owners such as Bemi and Davis came to appreciate another captive benefit: loss control and claims management.

For nonprofit captives in health care, the benefits of loss control and claims management have become an operational imperative. Good insurance and risk management equates to top-notch health care delivery, explained C. Richard Cornelius, who oversees two health care-related RRGs in Vermont: Indiana RRG and Heartland RRG.

“When we formed, the market was a total disaster.”– Michael Bemi, president, CEO and director, National Catholic RRG

In Cornelius’ experience, that means empowering individual risk managers — giving them a platform and the tools to effect change in their organizations. “I have always been a believer in a very strong, robust risk management program,” Cornelius said.

The health care industry in general became a believer after its professional liability insurance crises in the late ’70s and early 2000s. Nearly every major U.S. hospital system operates some form of self-insurance program and/or captive, said

Cornelius, and alternative risk transfer has increasingly become the insurance prescription for smaller, community-sized entities. As much as half of all medical-malpractice exposure in the U.S. is underwritten by captives, he said.

The attraction of quality claims management is especially important because of the rising tide of litigiousness in the United States, which has hit nonprofits as hard as every other type of organization.

“There is no reticence anymore to sue the church,” Bemi said.

For Cornelius and his health care insureds, the cost of litigation and claims management are an ongoing battle between two extremes — between a hospital appearing like a pushover ready to whip out its checkbook, and one appearing unfair to patients who’ve suffered an indefensible incident. Most cases are in the tricky, gray area in between.

Another looming threat is the ever-present charm offensive put on by the commercial marketplace.

If a big commercial carrier wants a certain type of business, they can cut prices and throw in coverages that captives may be unable to unwilling to entertain, said Bemi. Most captives don’t have the cash or the marketing resources to compete in a long, heated battle with traditional market players.

Advertisement




While Bemi hasn’t seen any commercial market incursions into his space yet, Cornelius sounded less sure. In health care, the cost of premiums has been suppressed for the last half-dozen years.

“Most people believe you have cycles, and you have had two [hard markets]. It’s got to happen again, right?” he said.

It hasn’t. That puts pressure on captives and RRGs to flatten costs and continue to offer valuable coverages, terms and risk management services.

Busting the Myths

One misguided notion about captives is that nonprofit insurance buyers are seeking tax avoidance. Since they don’t pay taxes, they clearly are after other benefits captives have to offer.

They’re also by and large keeping it onshore, in U.S.-based domiciles such as Vermont.

“There really is no reason to go outside the United States … pure and simple,” Cornelius said.

That isn’t just a budget issue, it can be a political one too. Flying executives to the Caymans or Bermuda could easily seem like a boondoggle to donors or an easy target for newspaper reporters.

Nonprofit captives also have their parent companies’ mission-driven nature to account for. “These are American land trusts conserving land in America,” Ratley-Beach said.

Here’s another myth: Nonprofits can’t bank enough surplus or wield enough risk management staff to self-insure, let alone launch a captive. Try telling that to Davis’ Nonprofits Insurance Alliance Group and its 13,000 member nonprofits.
These 501(c)(3) public-benefit organizations tend to be tiny yet complex for their size.

They pay little and ask their small staffs to handle stressful situations. They work with fragile populations. They tend to operate in vacuums left by “market failures” — e.g., homeless shelters — in neighborhoods that are far from pleasant. It’s no wonder that the commercial insurance market dried up for them 25 years ago.

Underwriters either had rules that prohibited writing nonprofits, Davis said, or they offered cookie-cutter coverages.

“Part of what we have been able to do is [create] coverage forms and loss control specific to this sector,” Davis said. Years ago, this included affirmative sexual abuse policies; today they include theft and injury coverage for volunteers.

Advertisement




Claims management services are a boon to smaller nonprofits. For those without in-house HR expertise, the captive offers “employment risk managers” (employment law attorneys) who can help manage incidents and defense claims.
On the loss control side, they can answer tough employment law and even D&O questions.

Do those benefits sound familiar? Yes, these are the same captive benefits that the largest nonprofits have sought for over a century — and the largest for-profit corporations, too, for nearly as long.

BlackBar

Complete Vermont 2015 Coverage:

04012015_vermont_tipin_profile_150pxBuilding an Engine for Global Risk Management Success.  A fully integrated captive brings risk management to the multiple arms of an organization.

 

04012015_vermont_tipin_noprofit_church_150The Surprising World of Nonprofit Captives. They comprise fully one-quarter of all captives domiciled in Vermont.

 

Lawmakers returnTrue Partners. The success of the captive industry in Vermont is the result of a rare, collaborative relationship between the public and private sectors.

Matthew Brodsky is editor of Wharton Magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]
Share this article:

Vermont 2015

True Partners

The success of the captive industry in Vermont is the result of a rare, collaborative relationship between the public and private sectors. 
By: | April 8, 2015 • 8 min read
Lawmakers return

Life is hard for most bills. It’s not easy to become a law.

“How I hope and pray that I will, but today I am still just a bill,” is the sad refrain of one of the more famous bills of all, Bill from the classic Schoolhouse Rock skit, “How a Bill Becomes a Law.”

Advertisement




That Bill waited for what seemed like an eternity to 8-year-olds everywhere watching the 1970s kids program, as he went from an idea to a bill stuck in committee to one languishing on the steps of the Capitol, worried that he would get the presidential veto.

If only Bill grew up to be the Vermont captive law. He would live a charmed life and be touted around the captive insurance world as the gold standard. Every year, he would get a makeover in a process of legislative improvement that is the epitome of bipartisan, productive policymaking. He would never experience rancorous, political sausage-making, never suffer the horrible fate of being tabled in a subcommittee to a subcommittee. Real Vermont captive law upgrades have succeeded nearly every year since the creation of the Vermont domicile in 1981.

VIDEO: Vermont Gov. Pete Shumlin talks about the captive industry in his state.

The Vermont captive law is a manifestation of one of the most constructive and successful private-public partnerships in the U.S. financial services industry. Communication channels between captive owners and managers, Vermont’s financial regulators and members of the state’s legislative finance committees are proactive and ongoing.

The result is, and has always been, that everyone benefits — the people of Vermont who enjoy a robust industry of well-paying jobs, captive owners who get the stringent but fair regulation they’re seeking, and the state treasury and its flow of tax income.

The Process, Revealed 

Just as that poor Bill in Schoolhouse Rock, Vermont’s captive laws begin each year as ideas, which are then hashed out, refined, tested and codified by the legislative process.

“Updating and improving our captive law is a Vermont tradition. We do it virtually every year. It is evidence that we never rest on our laurels as we are always trying to improve upon the previous year,” said Dan Towle, director of financial services at Vermont’s Agency of Commerce & Community Development.

Each fall, the Vermont Captive Insurance Association (VCIA) presents the state’s Department of Financial Regulation (DFR) with a “wish list” of items, alterations the industry would like to see in the law. The VCIA solicits ideas from its members through a survey, as well as in individual meetings with leaders from the captive management community, said VCIA President Richard Smith, who with his team then distills the industry’s top priorities.

“Sometimes we push the envelope,” Smith said of the ideas they bring to the regulators.

Deputy Commissioner David Provost mentions any concerns he has about these VCIA recommendations, Smith said, though the commissioner’s style is to rarely say “no” outright and instead always be open to how an idea might work.

In turn, chief captive regulator Provost and his DFR Captive Insurance Division team bring their own ideas to the table, along with any changes necessary to the law to maintain accreditation with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Through this meeting of minds, both groups of stakeholders trim and tighten the wish list until it takes on the form of a proposed bill that both sides can support and present to state lawmakers.

Dan Towle, director of financial services,  Vermont Agency of Commerce & Community Development

Dan Towle, director of financial services, Vermont Agency of Commerce & Community Development

“It’s a very collaborative process,” Towle explained. “It is part of the reason we are so successful in Vermont. If a change is proposed we keep an open mind to the proposal. If it makes sense, the proposal is fully vetted before it would be introduced in legislation.”

“We make sure that our regulators and our captives talk to each other,” seconded state Rep. Bill Botzow, a Democrat from Bennington and the chair of Vermont’s House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development.

“This gives the captives the highest assurance that as they undertake their work, that they are safe.”

These ideas take the first big leap toward becoming law when regulators present them as a draft bill to one of the committees of jurisdiction, the House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development or the Senate Finance Committee, whichever takes up the bill first. (In the case of the 2015 bill, the Senate Finance Committee had first crack.)

As Provost related the process, his team does not just place the bill before the legislature and then disappear to their offices a few blocks down the street. Regulators remain on hand to summarize the bill for legislators or even walk them through it, line by line, if necessary. They point out the significant changes of the year and their rationale. Said Botzow, lawmakers know a bill arrives in the state capitol well vetted by the time they see it.

Advertisement




The first committee then presents the bill to the full House or Senate, respectively, where it passes and travels to the next chamber for further consideration. Thereafter, it is christened into law with the flourish of the governor’s pen. Gov. Peter Shumlin, it should be noted, is an important member of this public-private success story, and the state’s executive has always been, whether Democrat or Republican.

That doesn’t mean, though, that the bill isn’t made to proverbially sweat a bit. Lawmakers give it more than a once over; they ask questions and make their own revisions. They are partners in the process, and they take responsibility for their constituents’ and the state’s well-being.

“ ‘Politics as usual’ in Vermont is a bit different from some other places. We may have our differences of opinion, but we move things along.” —  David Provost, deputy commissioner of captive insurance, Vermont

“Our legislature and governor are very savvy about captive insurance. We expect to get the tough questions when we testify before the legislature. They too take an ownership in our success in Vermont,” Towle said.

One might expect American politicians to take their jobs too seriously — or at least their political views and party lines too seriously — but perhaps the most amazing quality of the Vermont system is that it’s not afflicted with the venomous gridlock that stymies public policy in other locales and at the federal level.

Part of the reason is that Vermont politics in general doesn’t reach that level, according to insiders — even in an election cycle that saw the governor’s race so close that the legislature decided it and the loser threatened to challenge the results.

“ ‘Politics as usual’ in Vermont is a bit different from some other places,” Provost said. “We may have our differences of opinion, but we move things along.”

Another explanation has to do with how well lawmakers are educated about the importance of the captive industry. In 2013, the state reaped more than $27.4 million in premium tax benefits and related industry fees, and by the most recent count, the industry has created more than 1,400 jobs in the state.

The industry itself is so well established in Vermont that even if incoming lawmakers don’t understand the technical aspects of captives, they are familiar with their positive impact, explained Smith.

In part, that’s because the industry does a good job of delivering that message to lawmakers, both incumbents and newly elected. Each January at the start of the legislative session, VCIA brings industry representatives to Montpelier. Experts present on captive basics and benefits, and captive owners testify to the successes of their alternative risk transfer vehicles.

“It’s a day for us to go up and wave the captive flag,” Smith said.

Even for an experienced legislator like Botzow, face-to-face time with captive leaders allows him to catch up on the state of the industry both at home and abroad, on the influx and outflux of captives to Vermont, best practices on how captives are reserving and other pertinent information. If the industry reps and regulators miss something, elder statesmen do their part to bring their younger colleagues up to speed.

One group in this public-private partnership that needs no refresher on captive basics is the regulatory team. Since the industry came into being with the very first captive law in Vermont in 1981, only three individuals have served as its regulatory leader.

That speaks to a consistency of vision and application of the law. It’s this depth of experience and long timeframe, said Smith, that also explains how Vermont captive regulators have built such relationships and reputations in Montpelier, as well as among captive owners and managers across all domiciles, onshore and off.

The other group, of course, are the for-profit and nonprofit organizations that own Vermont’s captives, as well as the vendors who offer accounting, actuarial, legal, captive management and other services. One main reason Vermont’s public-private partnerships work is that these organizations value the firm but fair, gold standard regulation, said their chief representative Smith.

Ultimately, what derives from such sound public policy is an exemplary system that is always being improved upon. In 2014, for instance, the new captive law featured two significant changes related to captives’ dormant status and reciprocal insurers.

Expect five alterations to come out of the 2015 captive law. As Provost reported at the writing of this article, the wish list included:

  • Reduction in the number of necessary incorporators from three to one.
  • Lowering of the minimum capital and surplus of sponsored cell companies, and allowing marketable securities, as well as cash, to satisfy minimum capital and surplus requirements.
  • Adding naming conventions to incorporated cells.
  • Providing more explicit protections for the cells and the sponsors.
  • New corporate governance standards for risk retention groups to ensure they are member-owned-and-operated insurers.

The changes reflect the drive to remain in line with the latest regulatory developments and in touch with the reality on the ground.

Advertisement




For instance, the new capital and surplus levels for sponsored cells reflect the fact that most cells are fully funded and that capital in the core company isn’t as much of a concern.

At the time of this writing, the 2015 bill had not yet become law and these changes hadn’t gone into effect, but odds are they will soon.

As Smith recounted, he’s had lawmakers ask him, “How can we do this with other business issues?”

 

BlackBar

Complete Vermont 2015 Coverage:

04012015_vermont_tipin_profile_150pxBuilding an Engine for Global Risk Management Success.  A fully integrated captive brings risk management to the multiple arms of an organization.

 

04012015_vermont_tipin_noprofit_church_150The Surprising World of Nonprofit Captives. They comprise fully one-quarter of all captives domiciled in Vermont.

 

Lawmakers returnTrue Partners. The success of the captive industry in Vermont is the result of a rare, collaborative relationship between the public and private sectors.

 

Matthew Brodsky is editor of Wharton Magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]
Share this article:

Sponsored: Liberty International Underwriters

Detention Risks Grow for Traveling Employees

Employees traveling abroad face new abduction risks that are more difficult to resolve than a ransom-based kidnapping.
By: | June 1, 2015 • 6 min read
LIU_BrandedContent

It used to be that most kidnapping events were driven by economic motives. The bad guys kidnapped corporate employees and then demanded a ransom.

These situations are always very dangerous and serious. But the bad guys’ profit motive helps ensure the safety of their hostages in order to collect a ransom.

Recently, an even more dangerous trend has emerged. Governments, insurgents and terrorist organizations are abducting employees not to make money, but to gain notoriety or for political reasons.

Without a ransom demand, an involuntarily confined person is referred to as ‘detained.’ Each detention event requires a specialized approach to try and negotiate the safe return of the hostage, depending on the ideology or motivation of the abductors.

And the risk is not just faced by global corporations but by companies of all sizes.

LIU_BrandedContent“The world is changing. We see many more occasions where governments are getting involved in detentions and insurgent/terrorist groups are growing in size and scope. It’s the right time for a discussion about detention risks.”

— Tom Dunlap, Assistant Vice President, Liberty International Underwriters (LIU)

“Practically any company with employees traveling abroad or operations overseas can be a target for a detention risk,” said Tom Dunlap, assistant vice president at Liberty International Underwriters (LIU). “Whether you are setting up a foreign operation, sourcing raw materials or equipment overseas, or trying to establish an overseas sales contract, people are traveling everywhere today for so many reasons.”

Emerging Threats Driven By New Groups Using New Tools

Many of the groups who pose the most dangerous detention threats are well versed in how to use the Internet and social media for PR, recruiting and communication. ISIS, for example, generates worldwide publicity with their gruesome videos that are distributed through multiple electronic channels.

Bad guys leverage their digital skills to identify companies and their employees who conduct business overseas. Corporate websites and personal social media often provide enough information to target employees who are working abroad.

LIU_BrandedContentAnd if executives are too well protected to abduct, these tools can also be used to identify and target family members who may be less well protected.

The explosion of new groups who pose the most dangerous risks are generally classified into three categories:

Insurgents – Detentions by these groups are most often intended to keep a government or humanitarian group from delivering services or aid to certain populations, usually in a specific territory, for political reasons. They also take hostages to make a political statement and, on occasion, will ask for a ransom.

In other cases, insurgent groups detain aid workers in order to provide the aid themselves (to win over locals to their cause). They also attempt prisoner swaps by offering to trade their hostages for prisoners held by the government.

The most dangerous groups include FARC (Colombia), ISIS (Syria and Iraq), Boko Haram (Nigeria), Taliban (Pakistan and Afghanistan) and Al Shabab (Somalia).

Governments – Often use detention as a way to hide illegal or suspect activities. In Iran, an American woman was working with Iranian professors to organize a cultural exchange program for Iranian students. Without notice, she was arrested and accused of subversion to overthrow the government. In a separate incident, a journalist was thrown in jail for not presenting proper credentials when he entered the country.

“Government allegations against detainees vary but in most cases are unfounded or untrue,” said Dunlap. “Often these detentions are attempts to prevent the monitoring of elections or conducting inspections.”

Even local city and town governments present an increased detention risk. In one recent case, a local manager of a foreign company was arrested in order to try and force a favorable settlement in a commercial dispute.

Ideology-driven terrorists – Extremist groups such as Boko Haram and ISIS are grabbing most of today’s headlines with their public displays of ultra-violence and unwillingness to compromise. The threat from these groups is particularly dangerous because their motives are based on pure ideology and, at the same time, they seek media exposure as a recruiting tool.

These groups don’t care who they abduct — journalist, aid worker, student or private employee – they just need hostages.

“The main idea here is to shock people and show how governments and businesses are powerless to protect their citizens and employees,” observed Dunlap.

Mitigating the Risks

LIU_BrandedContentEven if no ransom demands are made, an LIU kidnap and ransom policy will deliver benefits to employers and their employees encountering a detention scenario.

For instance, the policy provides a hostage’s family with salary continuation for the duration of their captivity. For a family who’s already dealing with the terror of abduction, ensuring financial stability is an important benefit.

In addition, coverage provides for security for the family if they, too, may be at risk. It also pays for travel and accommodations if the family, employees or consultants need to travel to the detention location. Then there are potential medical and psychological care costs for the employee when they are released as well as litigation defense costs for the company.

LIU coverage also includes expert consultant and response services from red24, a leading global crisis management assistance firm. Even without a ransom negotiation to manage, the services of expert consultants are vital.

“We have witnessed a marked increase in wrongful detentions involving the business traveler. In some regions of the world wrongful detentions are referred to as “business kidnappings.” The victim is often held against their will because of a business dispute. Assisting a client who falls victim to such a scheme requires an experienced crisis management consultant,” said Jack Cloonan, head of special risks for red24.

Without coverage, the fees for experienced consultants can run as high as $3,000 per day.

Pre-Travel Planning

LIU_BrandedContent

Given the growing threat, it is more important than ever to be well versed about the country your company is working in. Threats vary by region and country. For example, in some locales safety dictates to always call for a cab instead of hailing one off the street. And in other countries it is never safe to use public transportation.

LIU’s coverage includes thorough pre-travel services, which are free of charge. As part of that effort, LIU makes its crisis consultants available to collaborate with insureds on potential exposures ahead of time.

Every insured employee traveling or working overseas can access vital information from the red24 website. The site contains information on individual countries or regions and what a traveler needs to know in terms of security/safety threats, documents to help avoid detention, and even medical information about risks such as pandemics, etc.

“Anyone who is a risk manager, security director, CFO or an HR leader has to think about the detention issue when they are about to send people abroad or establish operations overseas,” Dunlap said. “The world is changing. We see many more occasions where governments are getting involved in detentions and insurgent/terrorist groups are growing in size and scope. It’s the right time for a discussion about detention risks.”

For more information about the benefits LIU kidnap and ransom policies offer, please visit the website or contact your broker.

Liberty International Underwriters is the marketing name for the broker-distributed specialty lines business operations of Liberty Mutual Insurance. Certain coverage may be provided by a surplus lines insurer. Surplus lines insurers do not generally participate in state guaranty funds and insureds are therefore not protected by such funds. This literature is a summary only and does not include all terms, conditions, or exclusions of the coverage described. Please refer to the actual policy issued for complete details of coverage and exclusions.

SponsoredContent
BrandStudioLogo
This article was produced by the R&I Brand Studio, a unit of the advertising department of Risk & Insurance, in collaboration with Liberty International Underwriters. The editorial staff of Risk & Insurance had no role in its preparation.




LIU is part of the Global Specialty Division of Liberty Mutual Insurance.
Share this article: