Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Strengthening a Covenant

The share of the American workforce filled by foreign-born workers has increased from one in 10 in 1990 to one out of six in 2006. Immigrants thrive here as workers because labor shortages exist along a broad expanse of jobs. Close to half of the software engineers in this country are foreign-born.

By Peter Rousmaniere

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Many immigrants take on tough jobs and this is where occupational safety and workers' compensation come into that picture.

A manual labor workforce with little education and poor English language skills creates challenges for the employer acting in good faith. For the exploiter, those challenges create an opportunity.

It is no accident that the Raeford, N.C.,-based poultry processing firm, House of Raeford Farms Inc., recruited Hispanic workers to fill its production line jobs.

According to a report by the Charlotte Observer, House of Raeford had a predatory safety and injury policy, highly successful until an investigative reporting team blew the whistle.

The company's 800-worker plant in West Columbia, S.C., reported no musculoskeletal disorders for more than four years. Its Greenville, S.C., plant reported no lost time accidents for seven million work hours.

A lightning fast return-to-work program hauled workers back to work hours after surgery. At least nine workers had suffered amputations or bone fractures.

The newspaper reported that the company dismissed some workers' requests to see a doctor, even when workers complained of debilitating pain.

It is unfair to equate this abusive employer with many others who train and supervise immigrant workers across a language divide. To illustrate, in 2006, 46 percent of the U.S. workforce had limited English proficiency.

Yet the employer must do more than think it is acting in good faith. It must be vigilant about cultural miscues, wayward first-line supervisors and slippery or incompetent suppliers. And it may have to act within an industry initiative.

To be sure, many employers try to prosper by treating workers like replacement parts. They hire workers on the cheap and then abandon those who fall by the wayside.

Doctors in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine are citing more instances of employers trying to improve their injury logs by pressuring doctors to treat in certain ways.

Protecting workers, day by day, remains the employer's burden and industrywide initiatives to address immigrant workforces can work. They work in Las Vegas and they also work in Florida's agricultural industry, thanks in part to the Socially Accountable Farm Employers, a nonprofit organization that provides independent auditing and certification of fair, lawful farm labor practices.

We are an immigrant nation. Eight of 20 world cities with at least one million foreign-born residents are located in America. We keep on importing more workers, workers we need to fill our labor shortages.

Foreign labor has become virtual. Overseas support staffs are helping workers' comp claims staffs. Nurses in the Philippines are doing utilization reviews for American insurers. They are very small in number but they confirm the porosity of national borders.

We are a nation made exceptional not by laws, skills or power but by a covenant which binds together immigrants. The House of Raeford case is a tear in that covenant and we must do better.

PETER ROUSMANIERE is a Vermont-based columnist for Risk & Insurance®.

September 1, 2008

Copyright 2008© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.