Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

The Market's New Foreign Forces

The power of ratings agencies and modelers.

By Matthew Brodsky

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Policyholders holding their breath for the next soft market swing may pass out.

According to experts at a leading brokerage firm, the outside influence of the ratings agencies might moderate any future softening of property rates.

Instead of relying on the natural ebb and flow of the insurance cycle, said Kevin J. Madden, managing director of Aon's Real Estate Practice, policyholders now have to hope that additional capacity floods the property-catastrophe market for their rates to drop.

Madden was speaking at an Aon Web seminar titled "Real Estate Property Insurance: Crisis or Hysteria?" that occurred in August.

And the reason, said the brokers speaking at the event, that policyholders are holding their breath--hiked up property rates, especially prevalent along the coast and in certain industries like real estate and energy--is in part the result of another outside power in the insurance industry: the modelers.

According to the seminar speakers, the new version of one CAT model in particular--Risk Management Solutions Inc.'s 2006 hurricane model--has caused upwards of 40 percent to 100 percent increases in insurers' probable maximum losses, or PMLs.

The firm's earthquake model has also caused a jump in PMLs. This perhaps can explain why there has been a 70 percent drop in active catastrophe capacity.

Insurers are also shedding exposure because ratings agencies are asking them to prove that they can handle not only a massive, one-time loss, but multiple, simultaneous catastrophe hits, said Aaron Davis, director of terrorism and property resources for Aon Risk Services national practice groups.

As Madden described them, ratings agencies have become the "governors" of the market.

October 1, 2006

Copyright 2006© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.