Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Complacency Isn't an Option



By Susan Gurevitz

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Editor's note: Writer Susan Gurevitz interviewed Stanley Hupfeld, president and CEO of Integris Health. Hupfeld has overseen the operations of Integris Health in that capacity for more than 15 years. During that time, the health-care organization launched its No-Lift safety program, designed to reduce workers' comp incidences and costs--and simply to keep its workers from injuring themselves.

Susan Gurevitz: How does workers' compensation fit into your management philosophy?

Stanley Hupfeld: We consider ourselves very focused on being the very best employer that we can be. So we're proactive. Sitting back and waiting for workers' comp problems to happen is not a very good solution. So we're more comprehensive in our approach.

Gurevitz: What convinced you that the risk management approach, the No-Lift policy, was the way to go?

Hupfeld: Up until then we had been inconsistent, and we needed to take a more pervasive view. Like most hospitals, we have an aging work force, so we needed to do something to keep our workers safe from injuries.

Gurevitz: Integris has spent $2.3 million on safety devices and equipment since 2000. That's a major expenditure. Have you budgeted to spend more as needed?

Hupfeld: Yes, we have budgeted for whatever it takes. After all, we have a $100 million capital budget every year, so $2.3 million is not that major an expenditure. Besides, with the savings we've generated--$2.7 million annually--it pays for itself in a year or two. Plus, it's just a smart business thing to do.

Gurevitz: What's been the board's response?

Hupfeld: They don't necessarily understand all the details of workers' comp, but they're extremely proud of our program and savings. The awards we've earned are evidence of our success. They've been very supportive.

Gurevitz: From your viewpoint, what are the biggest challenges in workers' comp that lie ahead of your organization?

Hupfeld: Our work force is older now. The average age of our nurses is 42, and older people are even more susceptible to injuries. So we have to have the willpower to be consistent and offer the encouragement to do so. Plus, we never can overlook the importance of our return-to-work programs and case management. The equipment will help prevent the injuries.

November 1, 2006

Copyright 2006© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.