Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

A Brighter Brownfield Future



By Matthew Brodsky

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

While the topic is brownfields that can "make a difference," so-called brightfields should get a spotlight. They are a way to transform an ordinary brownfield into a renewal energy power plant. In the process of being touchy-feely with the environment, corporations can also use a brightfield to land government grants, make for easier remediation and save on their energy bills.

"Brightfields are brownfields with a twist," says Veronica Benzinger, senior vice president at Aon Environmental.

Simply put, a brightfield is a brownfield site with solar-energy panels on it that funnel energy to the power grid. The Department of Energy is a brightfield fan, says Benzinger, for several reasons. Brightfields increase the available power supply with a green, sustainable source. They create high-tech jobs. And they're a less invasive way to deal with polluted sites.

Corporations with potential brownfield sites on their hands might be most interested in that last incentive. Less invasive means that owners of brownfields would only have to cap a landfill and then place solar panels on top. That makes it usually simpler to pull off, less risky and less expensive.

For typical brownfields, on the other hand, redevelopment is invasive. "In other words," says Benzinger, "I'd have to dig a foundation, I would disturb soil, I would have to put in utilities. These kinds of development activities would require different kinds of remediation protocol."

Corporations can also get tax incentives for a brightfield, she says. At the local and regulatory level, monetary rewards are doled out to brownfield redevelopers in general, but brightfields attract even more dollars--tax incentives and DOE grants--as a source of sustainable energy.

Brightfields have been a "pet project" for the DOE for the half-dozen or so years of their existence. Is there love on the other side, however? Benzinger isn't sure that developers clamor over them.

But Charles Perry, principal of Environmental Assurance Group, suggests that developers might catch on to the trend. "They'll justify it by renewable energy source documentation, and it's got to work or else it wouldn't be able to be financed," he says. "But what drives them there is the economic desire to get another deal done."

"We're still a capitalist society," he adds.

August 1, 2006

Copyright 2006© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.