Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

The Analytics Behind the Aid



By Paula L. Green

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The World Food Programme's recent deal with Axa Re was a derivative, or a financial transaction that transferred the risk from one entity to another, based on an index. In this case, the index was rainfall in Ethiopia. But the terms of payment involved complex equations that used modeling techniques to incorporate variables such as rainfall levels, different types of crops and more than two dozen recording sites around the northeast African nation.

Unlike the traditional insurance policy that indemnifies an insured for a measurable loss, an index-based product uses an index, such as rainfall or temperature, as a proxy for determining loss.

A combination of evolving computer software programs, mathematical wizardry and brainy engineers have helped spur the development of such tools and catastrophic risk modeling in general over the past decade. Also referred to as extreme risk or parametric risk modeling, this technology is helping the insurance industry and large companies quantify and manage the risks emanating from natural hazards such as hurricanes, earthquakes, windstorms and floods.

Analysts say the billions of dollars lost during Hurricane Andrew in the summer of 1992 helped spur its development.

"Up to then, it (catastrophic risk modeling) had been a curiosity," says Warren Isom, a senior vice president at the Philadelphia office of Willis Re. "But a lot of people lost a lot of money in Hurricane Andrew. And for some small firms, it was a real embarrassment."

The Northridge Earthquake that hit 20 miles northwest of Los Angeles in 1994 and the Kobe Earthquake in Japan a year later just accelerated the process.

Today, three firms--AIR Worldwide Corp., headquartered in Boston; Risk Management Solutions Inc. in Newark, Calif.; and Eqecat Inc. in Oakland, Calif.--have taken the lead in helping companies make crucial decisions about managing their catastrophic risks. Experts weave sophisticated computer technologies and mathematical formulas with the latest data and research findings in meteorology, seismology, hydrodynamics and structural engineering to create models that help quantify the losses from natural disasters.

Insurers and reinsurers can then better underwrite hazards, price their products and make decisions about transferring their risks. Corporations with large real-estate holdings, such as big-box retailers, factories or power plants, also use the information.

September 1, 2006

Copyright 2006© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.