Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

RIMS Hot Topics: Pandemics and Hurricanes

Managers ponder a course of action for a flu outbreak, but are forced to react to conditions in the property catastrophe market.

By Matthew Brodsky and Michelle Kerr

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

While the risk of an avian flu pandemic is flying on radar screens, only a small percentage of companies have taken steps toward building pandemic preparedness plans, according to risk executives.

Yet some in the retail industry are already feeling the pandemic pinch, despite the lack of human-to-human transmission cases.

At some Gap stores, for instance, employees are already refusing to open shipments from Asian countries, particularly those shipments that have accumulated visible bird droppings en route to their destinations.

Operationally dependent upon both their employee and customer populations, smart retailers are already considering methods of riding out the avian storm even if scores of employees are stricken with illness and customers are too paralyzed by fear to come out and shop.

One answer is to shift to a heavier focus on online sales to accommodate customers afraid to leave their homes. Retailers are also exploring questions about which segments of their employee population would be eligible for temporary telecommuting, as well as the disability benefit option available to those employees stricken by the avian flu.

Although most companies aren't far past the "we've-formed-a-committee" stage of planning, at least they're acknowledging the risks, rather than taking the foolhardy view that pandemic risk is merely something the media has whipped into a froth.

Whether an avian flu mutates and jumps from one human being to another, we will have to wait and see. More mundane worries filled the halls of the annual convention of the Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc. in Honolulu in April.

With hurricane season around the corner, the property and business interruption losses, and the resulting claim headaches from last year's Three Sisters, Katrina, Rita and Wilma, filled the minds of many.

Mary Lynn "Mel" Banks, the risk manager of Omni Hotels, said the market is looking much different than the one that insurance buyers faced after Sept. 11, 2001. Whereas five years ago, the terrorist attacks sent most if not all lines spiraling out of control, post-Katrina, the casualty market still appears stable and unaffected. It's really only the property CAT market that looks bad.

And bad it is. Right now, it's looking worse than New Orleans after Katrina. The mess in the property catastrophe market is likely to remain for a while. At least 170 court cases have been filed in the Gulf that deal with wind versus flood, on top of the high-profile cases put out by the Mississippi Attorney General, Jim Hood, and by tort king Dicky Scruggs.

Until this issue is cleared up, don't expect the market to settle.

June 1, 2006

Copyright 2006© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.