Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Letters to the Editor



Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

He Should Know

Dear Editor,

I happened upon the article "One Long, Long Mission," (Risk and Insurance®, March 2007, p. 36) by James Schacht and Lynne Hepler. I have a few comments. I was chief counsel and a special deputy insurance commissioner for the California Insurance Commissioner in connection with the Mission Insurance Co. insolvency. As Mr. Schacht knows, both Bill Price and I had quite substantial prior experience. Mine can be reviewed at www.Insurance-Solutions.us.

More significantly, Mr. Schacht also knows that, if an insurer cannot meet its policyholder liabilities as they come due, the company is insolvent, regardless of whether it is able, more than two decades later, to pay creditors. Paying some policyholders immediately and others over a period of 20 years would violate statutory mandates and be an illegal preference.

The reason the companies ultimately paid policyholders was because my firm Rubinstein & Perry and the administration under Bill Price sued and recovered more than $2.6 billion from these recalcitrant reinsurers. Further, we did try to find a workable rehabilitation plan for the Mission companies. Indeed, we successfully rehabilitated Mission American Insurance Co., and payments from this plan over the ensuing years have aided the payment of the creditors of the other Mission entities.

We did win the litigation over the offset issue in that the reinsurers were denied the right to set off on a "company-to-company" basis. They were allowed certain offsets on a "contract-by-contract" basis, but the California Supreme Court decision was a 4-3 decision with a blistering dissent in our favor.

Mr. Schacht was a deputy commissioner in the Illinois Department of Insurance, and that is why I say he should know these things. One would like to compare the Mission insolvency to Mr. Schacht's own track record at the Illinois Department.

KARL RUBINSTEIN

Corpus Christi, Texas

May 1, 2007

Copyright 2007© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.