Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Workplace Class Actions Cost More

Report: Workplace suits emerged in 2006 as top legal risk.

By Matthew Brodsky

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Sure, shareholder and securities class-action filings seem to be down, but another type of class action is registering on employers' radars. Workplace-related suits are becoming the No. 1 driver of corporate legal budgets, according to a report from Chicago-based law firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

The fastest growing workplace suits in 2006, and the ones with the highest settlements, were wage and hour collective actions, which have become "low-hanging fruit" to the plaintiffs' bar, said Gerald L. Maatman Jr., co-chair of the firm's complex discrimination litigation practice group and general editor of the report.

"Companies haven't necessarily looked at their payroll practices in a while, and they're being caught in payroll problems," Maatman said.

The plaintiffs' bar, according to the Seyfarth Shaw report, also caught on to arguments made in Dukes, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the gender discrimination claim filed by 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the case Feb. 6, 2007, after the report was published, but plaintiffs' attorneys started pursuing "mega-classes" and punitive-damages-only class actions in 2006, thanks to Dukes.

"It creates the conditions where federal courts in California are very, very friendly to these expansive damage remedies and these expansive classes," Maatman said.

Another trend noted by Seyfarth Shaw: The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission became more litigious after April 2006, when it launched a new directive to aggressively pursue litigation where it detects a pattern of discrimination.

"I practice every day in the trenches, and I've noticed quite a shift in the last eight to 10 months, a huge shift in the way the EEOC investigates charges," Maatman said.

As for Employee Retirement Income Security Act workplace suits, the "hot raging issue" since the end of 2006 has been 401(k) fund fees, said Maatman. Plaintiffs are charging that their funds are not transparent or fair--in 15 suits filed in the last two months alone.

For its third annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report for 2006, Seyfarth Shaw analyzed 407 rulings across the United States.

May 1, 2007

Copyright 2007© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.