Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Dodging Bullets

Broker and insurer CEOs face off on contingent commissions.

By Erin Fogg

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

At first, it appeared as if the CEO leadership panel at the annual meeting of the Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc. on May 1 would proceed as a routine luncheon with insurance company and broker CEOs singing their own praises and expertly dodging questions posed by audience members via moderators.

But then the panel was faced with the difficult question of what's to be done about the latest version of contingent commissions: supplemental payments.

Brian Storms, chairman and CEO of Marsh, broke the ice with a joke, saying "some of us were going to ask Joe about that, but I don't see him here," referring to Joseph Plumeri, chairman and CEO of Willis Group Holdings. Plumeri, who declined to participate at the last minute, has forbidden brokers from accepting the supplemental payments.

Storms ended his comments by saying the issue is not reserved just to brokers, but that it is a much broader problem and that Marsh would be taking its time with coming up with a solution that would be good for the industry, the company and its clients.

Even Storms' archcompetitor, Gregory Case, president and CEO of Aon Corp., disappointed and called for a truce with Storms, with whom he bickered at the 2006 conference. Case recognized Storms' "very good points" and said he wanted to "go on record as agreeing" with him. What's needed, said Case, is a candid dialogue between brokers and their clients, so that, among other reasons, "we can help you understand the value we provide."

J. Patrick Gallagher, president and CEO of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., said he wanted to clear the air after a recent article "made me sound cavalier about supplemental commissions." Gallagher praised his company and his colleagues for their commitment to transparency on the issue, saying it "really is a huge change" over the last several months, but hinting that it was "interesting" that only four brokers have been able to take that position.

Evan Greenberg, president and CEO of ACE Ltd., didn't seem impressed with the brokers' responses. "Transparency doesn't eliminate the problem," he said. Applause from the audience followed his next comment that there is an inherent conflict of interest in supplemental payments and brokers are supposed to work for their clients.

When pressed further on the topic of commissions, the discussion heated up.

The line between the front row comprised of brokers--Storms, Case and Gallagher--and the back row comprised of carrier execs--Greenberg, Martin J. Sullivan, president and CEO of AIG, Shivan Subramaniam, chairman and CEO of FM Global, and John Amore, CEO of general insurance at Zurich--became sharp and clear.

Moderator and former RIMS president Ronald W. Stasch pushed pressed further still after he said audience members submitted complaints that he had let the panel off the hook on the topic of contingent commissions earlier in the discussion.

Greenberg immediately chimed in, saying "I think that's a question that the guys in the front row have to address." He added that the insurers want to get their premiums from the brokers as soon as possible.

"And we want to get our policies written as soon as possible," Storms fired back.

Case and Gallagher remained on the sidelines, with Case saying that if an Aon client was behind the audience complaint "fantastic, let's talk about it." Gallagher said "in a transparent world, our terms of trade should be your terms of trade."

Wrapping up the discussion, Storms admitted that contingent commissions are an issue that couldn't be solved that day, but that the panel would provide "great media sound bites" to make for "interesting fodder" in the press.

And so they have.

June 1, 2007

Copyright 2007© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.