Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

For the City of Angels, Enterprise Risk Management Can Wait

For the City of Angels Enterprise Risk Management Can Wait | Risk & Insurance

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By DAN REYNOLDS, senior editor

Spurred in part by the $35 million that the city paid out in liability claims in 2006, Los Angeles Controller Laura Chick, has issued a report calling for the implementation of enterprise risk management across the city's 40 departments and agencies.

The report, issued early in 2008, is critical of the city's ability to minimize and prevent risk.

"From the top down, the city does not have a clearly defined and communicated strategy in proactively preventing losses before they occur," wrote Chick, in a January letter directed at Los Angeles' mayor and members of the City Council.

The report includes these prickly observations.

--The city does not have defined risk management governance processes to provide guidance for the proactive and consistent identification, assessment and management of risk.

--Risk management is focused on risks that "appear" to be high risk, without the benefit of a structured risk assessment process.

--Current risk monitoring and reporting is limited.

--Since most risks are not formally assessed or monitored, limited information is available for decision making and resources are rarely allocated based on consideration of risk.

Drawing on an analysis of enterprise risk management programs enacted by municipal and regional governments in Canada, South Africa, Great Britain and Australia, Chick's office recommends the formation of an (ERM) steering committee that would include the mayor, herself, the city's chief administrative officer, its chief legislative analyst and the city attorney.

In a response to Chick's report, then Chief Administrative Officer Karen Sisson wrote that while she agreed that there is a need for a citywide ERM program, funding the infrastructure for ERM is another matter, making an implementation date 'indeterminable at this time.' "

December 1, 2008

Copyright 2008© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.