Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Resignation resulting from scheduling dispute triggers cap on PPD benefits

In Tennessee, when an employer offers to return an injured employee to work, but the employee resigns for reasons unrelated to her injury, her PPD benefits will be capped at 1 1/2 times her medical impairment rating.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Knollwood Manor v. Cox, No. M2008-00151-WC-R3-WC (Tenn. Work. Comp. 11/20/08).

Ruling: The Tennessee Supreme Court, Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel upheld the trial court's findings that a certified nursing assistant's injury arose out of her employment but reversed its finding that she did not make a meaningful return to work. The panel capped her permanent partial disability benefits at 1 1/2 times her medical impairment rating and modified the award accordingly.

Summary: A certified nursing assistant was injured when her car continued to roll as she was getting out of her car in the employer's parking lot. It rolled over her legs, resulting in a fractured ankle and bruising. The trial court found that the injury was compensable even though it occurred while the employee was on her way to work, as she planned to walk from her car to a van to attend a work-related seminar. The trial court also found that the employee's PPD benefits were not subject to a statutory cap because she had not made a meaningful return to work. It awarded her 99.6 percent PPD to the body as a whole.

The panel agreed that the injury was compensable but found that the employee's resignation was not related to her injury. It capped her PPD award at 1 1/2 times the 11 percent impairment rating assigned by an independent orthopedic surgeon.

The employee's treating orthopedic surgeon released her to return to work without restrictions within three months of the accident. However, an independent orthopedic surgeon assigned an 11 percent impairment rating to the lower extremities and assigned permanent restrictions.

The employee acknowledged that she resigned over what she felt was retaliatory scheduling, which required her to work several weekends in a row, including Christmas and New Year's Day. Because her resignation was unrelated to her work injury, the panel concluded that the trial court erred in finding that she had not had a meaningful return to work. Her PPD benefits therefore had to be capped at 16.5 percent to both legs.

January 12, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.