Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Judge can use discretion in calculating AWW where default would be unjust

In Colorado, a claimant's AWW may be calculated according to a discretionary exception to the default method of calculation.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Judge can use discretion in calculating AWW where default would be unjust

Case name: Avalanche Industries, et al. v. Clark and Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, No. 07SC255 (Colo. 12/15/08).

Ruling: The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a ruling by an administrative law judge finding the claimant's average weekly wage was correctly determined using the discretionary method of calculation.

What it means: In Colorado, a claimant's AWW may be calculated according to a discretionary exception to the default method of calculation. Where a claimant suffered an injury at a previous job but became permanently disabled in a subsequent job due to the injury, the AWW may be calculated using the second job's earnings and insurance costs.

Summary: The claimant injured her lumbar spine while working as a secretary. She was awarded workers' compensation for permanent partial disability at her first job. Before the claim was closed, she took a new job. She was precluded from accepting COBRA coverage from her first job because her subsequent employer also offered coverage. However, her condition worsened over time. She reopened the claim while employed at the second job. She was eventually declared permanently and totally disabled and was forced to retire. Her AWW at her second job was higher, and her initial employer argued the AWW should be calculated at the lower initial rate. The employer argued this rate should be applied because that was when the injury occurred. It also argued it should not have to pay her COBRA benefits at the rate of her second employer because she did not accept them while employed there.

The court reasoned that Colorado's discretionary exception should be used to calculate the claimant's AWW. It pointed out that while calculation of AWW is generally tied to the time of injury, the exception affords an ALJ discretion to determine AWW, including a claimant's cost for COBRA insurance. This is based not only on the claimant's wage at the time of injury, but on other relevant factors when the case's circumstances warrant it.

The court also noted the discretionary exception is limited by circumstances where a claimant can reopen a claim and circumstances where the default provision results in an injustice, and must take into account that all benefit awards under the workers' compensation scheme cannot exceed the monetary maximum in the statute.

February 10, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.