Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

A Note on the Data



By Bob Briscoe and Bob Meyer

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Rough estimates suggest that private carriers comprise 45 percent of the statewide market, the New York State Insurance Fund comprises 30 percent, and individual self-insured employers and group self-insured pools, trusts and plans account for the remaining 25 percent.

The New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board collects data from all insurance companies, including the State Insurance Fund, but does not collect data from New York self-insurers. Insurance rate-making data could not, therefore, lead to a complete evaluation of the effects of the swap on all employers in the state.

The Workers' Compensation Board provided Milliman with a transactional database of all lost-time claims in New York with loss dates between 2000 and 2005. Because this database included claims throughout the state, it covered private carrier, State Insurance Fund and self-insured claims. The database also included wage data on each claim.

The pricing model first had to determine what the cost of the indemnity benefits would have been had the claims in the database occurred in 2007. To do this, we adjusted all wages in the database to the 2007 wage level using a 3.5 percent annual wage inflation assumption.

We then isolated the nonscheduled permanent partial disability claims in the data and valued these claims for the life of each claimant using the 2007 average weekly wages and the disability rating percentage from the Workers' Compensation Board database. Superimposing the proposed duration limits resulted in a statewide savings of $882 million.

Having adjusted the historical wages in the Workers' Compensation Board database to the 2007 wage level, indemnity benefits for all other lost-time claims were determined, first using the current limit of $400 per week and a second time using the proposed $500-per-week limit. This resulted in additional statewide costs of $187 million.

The net savings of $695 million from indemnity benefits was then combined with reforms intended to streamline medical treatment, enhance return-to-work programs and strengthen anti-fraud measures to produce a systemwide savings in the range of 10 percent to 15 percent.

READ MORE: Features | Special Reports | Industry Risk Reports | Columnists | In-Depth Series

July 1, 2007

Copyright 2007© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.