Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Doctor's affiliation with medical school sufficient to allow comp evaluation

An examining doctor must show he is affiliated with a designated university medical school and not a private treating physician to be considered a university evaluator for workers' compensation purposes.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Morrison v. The Home Depot, et al., No. 2007-CA-002457-WC (Ky. Ct. App. 02/13/09).

Ruling: The Kentucky Court of Appeals agreed with the Workers' Compensation Board that the examining doctor was sufficiently affiliated with the university to be considered a "university evaluator." He could therefore conduct workers' compensation medical examinations.

What it means: An examining doctor must show he is affiliated with a designated university medical school and not a private treating physician to be considered a university evaluator for workers' compensation purposes.

Summary: The claimant injured his neck, shoulder and back in a work-related fall. Because questions about the condition of his shoulder persisted, the claimant needed to be examined by a "university evaluator." The Office of Workers' Claims referred the matter to the University of Louisville Medical School, which appointed a doctor. The doctor, an active, non-tenured professor at the medical school, maintained an outside office but did not actively treat patients.

The claimant objected to the doctor's findings, contending that the chosen doctor was not a university evaluator, as described by Kentucky law, but instead was a private practitioner. The Kentucky Supreme Court has indicated the law does not authorize universities to subcontract private physicians to perform evaluations.

Under Kentucky law, a "university evaluator" is defined as a doctor who is either employed by, or on the staff of, one of the designated medical schools. The Court of Appeals pointed out that at the time the claimant was evaluated, the doctor was a professor of orthopedic surgery at the medical school. It agreed that although the university had contacted the doctor at an outside clinic, it had done so because the doctor's office was physically located within the clinic and not because he happened to be an independent contractor with the clinic as well as a non-tenured professor.

March 16, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.