Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Claimant scores benefits despite action on tennis courts

Where the doctor is aware of the claimant's activities and continues to keep the claimant at a sedentary level, a temporary total disability award is warranted.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Thomas v. Caterpillar, 17 ILWCLB 7 (Ill. Ind. Comm. 2008).

Ruling: The Illinois Industrial Commission affirmed an arbitrator's award of 16 weeks of temporary total disability benefits to the claimant, who injured his left knee in a work accident.

What it means: In awarding TTD benefits, it is irrelevant that the claimant has stopped working for the employer or that he is playing recreational sports while on light duty. Where the doctor is aware of the claimant's activities and continues to keep the claimant at a sedentary level, a TTD award is warranted.

Summary: The claimant underwent surgery for a work-related left knee condition. He was taken off work starting that day and was not returned to light-duty work for two months. At that time, the doctor noted the claimant was doing well, had played doubles tennis, and could perform sedentary duties.

After playing two doubles matches on a Saturday, the claimant experienced increased soreness and returned to physical therapy. The arbitrator found the claimant entitled to 16 weeks of TTD, until the date the claimant's doctor found him at maximum medical improvement.

In awarding TTD, the arbitrator noted it was irrelevant that the claimant had stopped working for the defendant in 2005 or that he was playing doubles tennis while on light duty. Furthermore, the doctor was aware of the claimant's tennis habits. He continued to keep the claimant at a sedentary level until the MMI date.

Upon review, the commission affirmed and adopted the decision of the arbitrator.

March 26, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.