Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

And What if the CATs Came Back?

And What if the CATs Came Back? | Risk & Insurance | Capital is now the big and emerging risk in the property insurance markets. If a significant event occurs in the near future--on the scale of Hurricane Katrina or a major insured terrorism event similar in scope to the World Trade Center loss--it would be difficult for insurance companies to reload capital to replace the capital expended to pay those losses.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By GEORGE STRATTS, vice president of AIU Holdings' Property Casualty Group and also an executive vice president of Lexington Insurance Co.

Today, unlike in the past when, after a significant catastrophe loss, capital rushed in from many sources, far fewer capital recapitalization options are available. Accordingly, capacity in the property insurance markets likely would be reduced to the extent that there even might be midterm withdrawals of coverage; there would also likely be renewal problems.

Given the current state of the capital markets, it's even more important to understand what kind of events could cripple your industry and to know your exposures and the probable maximum loss you could sustain in a catastrophe. Armed with that knowledge, it is critical to know whether your carrier has the track record to match the risks that it is writing with its risk appetite and capacity.Similarly, you need to be aware of your carrier's aggregate exposures to these kinds of events and what its plans are to manage these losses and replenish its capital.

While important, a financial-strength rating is only one of the considerations. You need to know whether your carrier has a track record that shows it can survive these kinds of CAT events. You should question how much treaty reinsurance stands behind the risk and determine whether it is adequate. Then examine the financial condition of the reinsurers as well. It is not unreasonable for you to subject the reinsurers to the same kind of hard-nosed financial analysis that you apply to your direct insurer(s).

You need to examine your carrier's record on severe claims and whether they are prepared to handle the different kinds of catastrophic events to which you are exposed, such as high-category hurricanes, terrorism attacks and earthquakes. Know how quickly they are able to respond. This is particularly important with respect to business-interruption losses. Find out whether, in the past, the carrier had adequate adjusting resources and claims personnel to handle these kinds of losses.Know what kind of planning and precautions your carrier suggests that you take to avoid or reduce catastrophic losses.

Further, you should achieve an acceptable level of comfort concerning the renewal capacity that your carrier currently offers and what an event of this nature would mean for your coverage going forward. A simple rule: You also should be confident that your carrier is prepared to handle two catastrophic losses in a single year.

April 15, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.