Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Iowa: Bill to allow employees to choose doctors will raise costs, insurers say

Legislation that would allow injured workers in Iowa to choose their own doctors could result in higher costs for employers and poorer care for employees, according to an insurance group.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Officials from the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America urged lawmakers not to pass Senate File 155, introduced by Sen. Thomas G. Courtney, D-44th District. The legislation, successor to Senate Study Bill 1119, would change the Iowa workers' compensation law by allowing injured employees greater choice of their physician care. The state's current workers' comp law dictates that the employer may choose the treating physician to diagnose and treat occupational injuries and illness.

According to the PCIAA, changing the law could result in injured employees not receiving appropriate care for their workplace injuries. Employees, the group said, could select a provider who may not understand their workplaces or the nature of their tasks in order to establish an effective return-to-work program.

Ann Weber, regional manager and counsel for the PCIAA, said employers and insurers have an incentive to send injured workers to those providers who provide the best care in order to lessen the impact of the injury, the time off from work, and, ultimately, the cost of indemnity benefits.

"S.F. 155 would disrupt the important and critical balance between employees' needs for high quality medical care for injuries occurring in the workplace and employers seeking a predictable and insurable cost structure to accommodate employee needs," Weber said. "The likely impact would be higher medical and employer costs without any discernible benefit to the injured worker."

In addition, Weber said that Iowa employees who have concerns with their care already have the right to bring the matter before the state workers' comp committee.

Business leaders in Iowa have argued that workers who are able to choose their own treating physician for a workplace injury are often away from work longer and could continue to change doctors and order unnecessary tests that would be billed to the employer. Proponents of the bill, however, said that current restrictions actually prevent workers from receiving appropriate care.

April 16, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.