Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Employer's prolonged delay waives exclusive remedy defense

Under New York law, an employer waives the exclusive remedy defense if it waits until after "the point of final disposition" to raise the defense. This is especially true if another party will be prejudiced by the late assertion.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp., No. 5399N, 25228/00 (N.Y. App. Div. 03/03/09).

Ruling: The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division held that a contractor's unreasonable delay in asserting the workers' compensation exclusivity defense resulted in the defense being waived.

What it means: Under New York law, an employer waives the exclusive remedy defense if it waits until after "the point of final disposition" to raise the defense. This is especially true if another party will be prejudiced by the late assertion.

Summary: The employee was working for a contractor on a residential structure when he fell from planks and was impaled by a steal beam on the ground, causing him to become paraplegic and suffer other complications. The employee sued the landowner, who sued the contractor as a third-part defendant. The employee recovered more than $6 million from the landowner's insurer. The employee also obtained a judgment against the landowner and the contractor for $18 million.

After unsuccessfully appealing the judgment, the contractor asserted for the first time that because it was the employer, and it paid workers' compensation to the employee, the court could not enter a judgment against it based on workers' compensation exclusivity.

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division held that the contractor's unreasonable delay in asserting the defense of workers' compensation exclusivity resulted in the defense being waived. The court explained that under New York law, an employer relinquishes the exclusive remedy defense it waits too long to assert the defense. Waiting until after the appeal was finalized was too long, the court said.

The court pointed out that the contractor had assumed the landowner's defense in the case. The landowner then filed for dissolution. Allowing the contractor to assert the defense at this stage would cause prejudice to the employee, the court found.

The court held that the contractor could not raise the defense this far into the litigation.

May 14, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.