Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Comp act doesn't cover manager's back injury while bending to reach satchel

An employee fails to show an increased risk of injury when he simply reaches for his satchel.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Mata v. Dial Corp., 17 ILWCLB 37 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2009).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission denied benefits to an employee who injured his back while bending over to pick up his satchel from underneath his desk.

What it means: Where an employee simply bends over to reach for his satchel under his desk, without actually lifting his satchel, and feels the sudden onset of pain, he has failed to show an increased risk of injury under the Workers' Compensation Act.

Summary: A manager testified that he arrived at work, entered his office, and placed his satchel under his desk. After a meeting, he reached for his bag and felt a pop and severe pain in his back. The commission noted that the employee's job did not entail regular or significant bending or lifting. The employee had not even lifted his satchel yet. The commission noted bending is an every day, normal activity and the employee did not show any increased risk.

The satchel was heavy and contained a pad the manager needed for his next meeting. The commission pointed out that had he grabbed the satchel, and lifted and twisted it awkwardly to get the pad out when the injury occurred, then the lifting may have been considered an increased risk of employment. But he testified, and the medical records supported, that he simply bent over without lifting the satchel. The commission denied benefits.

June 1, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.