Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Claimant secures authorization for bariatric surgeon evaluation

Where preexisting obesity is a hindrance to a claimant's recovery, the employer is responsible for treating the obesity in order to treat the compensable back injury. Under such circumstances, the employer may authorize a bariatric surgeon evaluation to determine whether gastric bypass surgery is a viable option.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Morris v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, 16 FLWCLB 40 (Fla. JCC, West Palm Beach 2009).

Ruling: A Florida judge of compensation claims ordered the employer to authorize an evaluation with a bariatric surgeon, finding evidence existed to establish that the claimant's morbid obesity was a hindrance to his recovery from a compensable back condition.

What it means: Where preexisting obesity is a hindrance to a claimant's recovery, the employer is responsible for treating the obesity in order to treat the compensable back injury. Under such circumstances, the employer may authorize a bariatric surgeon evaluation to determine whether gastric bypass surgery is a viable option.

Summary: The claimant, who suffered a work-related back injury, filed a request for an evaluation for bariatric surgery, contending that his preexisting obesity was a hindrance to his recovery. The claimant's doctor testified he was never able to accurately weigh the claimant but estimated his weight to be between 400 and 500 pounds. The treating doctor testified that he attempted a lumbar epidural steroid injection, which was extremely difficult due to the claimant's weight. The doctor recommended weight loss and referred the claimant to a bariatric surgeon to consider whether bariatric surgery was reasonable or medically necessary. The employer's medical expert opined that gastric bypass surgery was not medically necessary but stated that obesity was a hindrance to treatment of a back condition.

In awarding an evaluation with a bariatric surgeon, the judge of compensation claims found the medical evidence overwhelming that the claimant's morbid obesity was a hindrance to his recovery from the compensable, low back condition. Other testifying doctors agreed that the claimant's back pain would improve with weight loss and that bariatric surgery could facilitate further improvement. The evidence from the authorized treating doctors supported the need for future physical therapy and medication and possible epidural steroid injections.

The JCC found that there are conservative modalities available to the claimant which will improve his condition after weight loss has been achieved. She ordered the employer to authorize the claimant to undergo an evaluation with a bariatric surgeon.

June 4, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.