Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Professor's bid to merge permanent disability ratings denied

In California, combining permanent disability percentages for different injuries is no longer permitted.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Vilkitis v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, California Polytechnic Institute State University, et al., No. B209235 (Cal. Ct. App. 06/18/09, unpublished).

Ruling: In an unpublished decision, the California Court of Appeal denied a professor's petition to combine his two permanent disability ratings into a single award.

What it means: In California, combining permanent disability percentages for different injuries is no longer permitted. The law requires physicians to consider each injury sustained, discount other causes, and apportion the injured worker's disability for cause to its source.

Summary: A professor sustained cumulative trauma to one knee while doing field work for the university. He later suffered a specific injury to the same knee. He filed separate applications for workers' comp benefits. The professor's qualified medical examiner evaluated and apportioned the injuries according to their cause. It was determined that the specific injury caused a 62 percent permanent disability and the cumulative trauma caused 14 percent. The professor would receive $68,057.50 if the awards were rated separately, but he would receive $100,165 plus a life pension if they were rated together. The professor argued that the permanent disability ratings should be merged into a single award. The Court of Appeal rejected his argument, reasoning that prior disabilities are presumed to still exist and must be apportioned out rather than calculated into the current injury. The court noted the employer is only responsible for the percentage of permanent disability caused by the work-related injury, as determined by a physician.

The court noted that physicians are required to "parcel out the direct cause of the disability, disconnect past injuries and any other causes, and apportion PD for cause." The Court of Appeal denied the professor's petition to merge the disability ratings.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.

August 3, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.