Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Failure to show disability sacks football player's attempt at scoring benefits

Under Michigan law, a claimant establishes disability by proving a limitation in wage earning capacity.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Daniels v. Event Staffing Inc., 23 MIWCLR 157 (Mich. W.C.A.C. 2009).

Ruling: A Michigan Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission majority reversed a decision awarding wage-loss benefits to a football player for severe injury to his back and right lower extremity, as he failed to establish he had a disability.

What it means: Under Michigan law, a claimant establishes disability by proving a limitation in wage earning capacity. To do this, the claimant must disclose his qualifications and training, even if they are not relevant to the job he was doing at the time of injury. Next, the claimant must prove what jobs he is qualified and trained to perform within the same salary range as his maximum earning capacity at the time of the injury.

Summary: A football player alleged he was severely injured as a result of being tackled, and was no longer able to play football. The majority of the commission believed that the football player had not sufficiently disclosed all of his qualifications and training insofar as his ability to obtain maximum earnings consistent with his physical limitations. In this context, his coaching experience, business experience, and his membership in the Screen Actors' Guild would demand some evidence of the availability of work within these fields and the earnings for such employment. The commission noted the football player had excluded a range of jobs that paid his maximum earnings, as he defined the universe of work suitable to his qualifications and training rather narrowly. The commission noted that the football player did not show that he was unable to obtain any of the jobs he identified as required to establish disability. However, the football player's failure to seek such work or offer an explanation as to why he did not seek such work was ultimately fatal to his claim.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.

October 1, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.