Emerging Strategies for Risk  
 
Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker TM Directory
Risk Innovators
Insights
Industry Events
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM
Award Nominations
Vendor Directories
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 
Print Email Write to the Editor Reprints

Casino dealer wins benefits for back condition

In Illinois, an orthopedic specialist's testimony that the employee's work duties aggravated a previous back injury, along with the employee's own supportive testimony, constitutes sufficient evidence of a work-related, repetitive stress injury.

Case name: Britton v. Harrah's Metropolis Casino, 17 ILWCLB 132 (Ill. W.C. Comm. 2009).

Ruling: The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission held that a casino employee successfully proved a compensable back injury due to her repetitive work duties. She was awarded medical expenses, temporary total disability, penalties, and attorney's fees.

What it means: In Illinois, an orthopedic specialist's testimony that the employee's work duties aggravated a previous back injury, along with the employee's own supportive testimony, constitutes sufficient evidence of a work-related, repetitive stress injury.

Summary: A casino dealer alleged she sustained a compensable back injury while dealing a stand-up card game. She testified that the game required her to twist her upper torso in order to take the cards in her left hand from the card dispenser located on her right side. The employee's doctor opined that she aggravated a prior back injury which was caused by repetitive bending and twisting as a card dealer. However, the casino's expert argued that the work incident was a minor contributing factor. The Workers' Compensation Commission affirmed and adopted the arbitrator's decision regarding compensability and remanded to reconsider the medical expenses and penalties to be assessed. The commission agreed the employee established her accident arose out of and in the course of employment and that a causal relationship existed between the accidental injury and her current back condition.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.


October 15, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

© Copyright 2010 LRP Publications. All rights reserved.