Emerging Strategies for Risk  
 
Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker TM Directory
Risk Innovators
Insights
Industry Events
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM
Award Nominations
Vendor Directories
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 
Print Email Write to the Editor Reprints

Business community pushes for hearing on Obama's nominee to head OSHA

Business advocacy groups are voicing their concerns about the Obama administration's choice to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The National Association of Manufacturers and the Coalition for Workplace Safety recently sent letters to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee urging lawmakers to hold a hearing on the president's selection of epidemiologist David Michaels for the position of assistant secretary of labor for the agency. The groups told the committee members that they want the opportunity to question Michaels on a range of issues, including his position on regulating work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Michaels, a research professor at George Washington University, has previously noted that ergonomics risks were the leading cause of workplace injuries and that OSHA had not developed a standard to adequately "protect workers from the hazard of poorly-designed work settings." Health and safety experts believe that Democrats may try to resurrect the Clinton administration's national ergonomics standard, which was repealed shortly after President George W. Bush took office.

"Michaels has advocated for more government regulation, even when the available science and data to support such regulations is inadequate or unsettled," the coalition wrote. "Because workplace safety is everyone's concern and we are committed to working with OSHA to meet our shared goal of improving safety in the workplace, we believe a hearing is warranted to thoroughly explore Professor Michael's views on key areas of OSHA operations, the direction the agency will take, and how his professional career might influence the decisions he would make in this position."

Although confirmation hearings for the position are common, nothing has been scheduled for Michaels, who was nominated in July.

"With the Obama administration indicating an aggressive agenda for OSHA, Michaels' nomination should be treated no differently than the other nominees who were given a hearing," the group said.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.




November 5, 2009

Copyright 2009© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

© Copyright 2010 LRP Publications. All rights reserved.