Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Reinforcing Quake Lessons

Earthquake expert reports on aftermath of Japan temblor.

By Matthew Brodsky

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Businesses can learn from sifting through the rubble of the 6.8-magnitude Niigata-Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake that occurred in central Japan on July 16, according to an expert recently back from the Pacific.

A top lesson taken home by Peter Yanev, director with catastrophe-loss-control firm Global Risk Miyamoto and co-founder of modeler Eqecat Inc.: Loss from an earthquake can come as much from post-event mistakes as from the event itself.

"Part of your risk is how your own people handle an event," he said.

He referred to Kashiwazaki nuclear plant, whose operator Tokyo Energy Power Co. waited three days to report a fire and radioactive leakage.

In those three days, international media broadcasted images of the fire and fed speculation about the damage. The result--the Japanese government shut down the site for the rest of the year to investigate. The catch--the plant had been correctly built to avoid critical damage and was properly shut down before the quake, Yanev said. TEPCO posted a formal apology on its homepage on Aug. 10, but it was too little, too late.

"Instead of engineering success, you have a massive communication failure and massive business interruption," said Yanev.

For another lesson, Yanev pointed to Riken Corp., whose manufacturing plant in the Niigata Prefecture site produces piston rings for nearly half of all Japanese automobiles. The ground shaking displaced the plant's heavy machinery. It took a week to get the factory running again, said Yanev, during which time automakers had to stop production on some lines.

The lesson--"Just-in-time manufacturing is OK if you don't have natural disasters," said Yanev, adding that emergency links in a supply chain are crucial.

Yanev's third insight is one that modelers, structural engineers like Yanev and other quake gurus can appreciate most. Typically, it's assumed and calculated into models that soft soil around a building is bad because it amplifies the shaking. Not true in the Niigata-Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake. The surrounding soil was soft, but traditional Japanese buildings in the area were heavy and stiff, said Yanev. The result was that the buildings behaved like a boat in choppy surf.

"You can shake the water all you want, nothing happens to the boat," he said.

TOP 5 MOST READ SEPTEMBER STORIES:

1. Innovation: The Tortoise and the Hare

2. Rousmaniere: The 'IT' Thing in Comp

3. Innovation: Shackled Souls

4. A Firestorm of Lawsuits Over Global Warming

5. Innovation: Gaining Acceptance

October 1, 2007

Copyright 2007© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.