Emerging Strategies for Risk  
 
Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorsTM
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Vendor Directories
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 
Print Tiger Bite: Risk-management firm fails to see risks in investment (Advertising Age) . It is available from Risk and Insurance Online at http://www.riskandinsurance.com/storylink.jsp?storyId=305834704'" width="117" align="center" style="border-style:none; background:lightgray; font-size:8px; cursor:pointer; vertical-align:middle;"> Email Tiger Bite: Risk-management firm fails to see risks in investment (Advertising Age) '" width="117" align="center" style="border-style:none; background:#d6d6ff; font-size:8px; cursor:pointer; vertical-align:middle;"> Write to the Editor Tiger Bite: Risk-management firm fails to see risks in investment (Advertising Age) '" width="117" align="center" style="border-style:none; background:lightgray; font-size:8px; cursor:pointer; vertical-align:middle;"> Reprints

Accenture was paying Tiger Woods about $7 million a year for its ad campaign that featured the golf star turned tabloid sinner. In total, the consultancy might have spent $200 million on the campaign. The author here can't get over how Accenture, which advises clients on risk management issues, failed to see the risk of putting its advertising eggs in one (extremely libidinous) basket.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

© Copyright 2010 LRP Publications. All rights reserved.