Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Honest belief that documents falsified supports termination decision

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that Tyson reasonably based its decision on its belief that the medical records were falsified or altered.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Thayer v. Tyson Foods, Inc., No. 09-5185 (6th Cir. 12/08/09, unpublished).

Ruling: In an unpublished decision, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for the employer. It held that the worker failed to show that the reason for his termination was pretext for retaliation.

What it means: In Tennessee, proof of discharge without evidence of a causal relationship between a worker's claim for benefits and his termination does not present an issue for a jury.

Summary: A Tyson chicken plant worker went to the plant's clinic complaining of wheezing and shortness of breath. The doctor determined the worker's illness was not work-related. The doctor gave the worker copies of his diagnosis to take to his employer. The worker filed a workers' compensation claim the next day. Tyson suspected an inconsistency between the copies the worker turned in and what it learned from the doctor. After an investigation, Tyson terminated the worker for altering medical documents. The worker alleged he was terminated in retaliation for filing a claim.

The 6th Circuit determined that Tyson reasonably based its decision on its belief that the medical records were falsified or altered. Particularly, the court noted the medical form submitted to Tyson had a questionable smudge or strike, and the worker offered no explanation as to why his version was different from the doctor's version. The court concluded the worker failed to show that Tyson's reasons for terminating him were pretext for retaliation.

The court also noted the worker's retaliation claim was weakened by the fact that in four years, Tyson terminated 40 employees for falsification of medical documentation and only five of them had filed workers' compensation claims.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.

February 8, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.