Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Despite release, worker wins fees for medical services dispute

In Oregon, a worker may be awarded attorney's fees in a medical services dispute even if a claim disposition agreement includes a release of the worker's right to attorney's fees.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp., Inc., et al. v. Watkins, et al., No. SC S057190 (Or. 02/19/10).

Ruling: The Oregon Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and affirmed the order awarding a worker attorney's fees.

What it means: In Oregon, a worker may be awarded attorney's fees in a medical services dispute even if a claim disposition agreement includes a release of the worker's right to attorney's fees.

Summary: A worker suffered a compensable back injury that resulted in partial paralysis of his legs. He entered a claim disposition agreement with the carrier releasing "all rights to all workers' compensation benefits . . . except for medical services" in exchange for monetary compensation. He later requested review of the carrier's refusal to provide him a wheelchair-accessible van. The carrier contested an award of attorney's fees on the medical services claim. It argued that under Oregon law the agreement resolved all rights to attorney's fees that could potentially arise from the claim. The Oregon Supreme Court disagreed with that interpretation, explaining that the law contains a phrase exempting medical services as something the worker could release in such an agreement. The court held that a claim disposition agreement does not resolve a worker's right to attorney's fees, when those fees are derived from a subsequent claim for medical services.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.

April 12, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.