Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

OSHA to consider business concerns in finalizing MSD recordkeeping regs

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is preparing to finalize regulations that will require employers to list work-related musculoskeletal disorders separately from other conditions on the agency's 300 Injury and Illness Log.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

After an extended comment period and a public forum on the proposed changes, OSHA officials plan to issue a final rule that would go into effect Jan. 1, 2011. Although many health and safety advocates support the regulations, business groups are concerned.

Karen Harned, executive director of the National Federation of Independent Business' Small Business Legal Center, said the proposal raises red flags for small businesses. She said that for a small business owner, good-faith efforts to comply with the regulation would require significant time away from their offices.

"Small businesses lack the resources to hire specialized regulatory compliance staff," she said. "Furthermore, identifying whether or not an MSD was sustained or would be aggravated in the workplace will be far more difficult. Small business owners are not medical practitioners. OSHA's assertion that the responsible person would only take an additional one minute from the time they take now to mark the form fails to recognize that the time to make the injury determination will go up as well."

Susan M. Walthall, acting chief counsel for advocacy for the U.S. Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy, said many small employers lack the sophistication to read and analyze new federal regulations and many do not employ regulatory professionals who can perform this task.

"Accordingly, many small businesses will have to hire attorneys and consultants to advise and train them on the new requirements," she said. "Neither the full cost of time spent analyzing this new federal requirement nor costs associated with consultations are included in the analysis."

OSHA has indicated that the recordkeeping revisions are not a prelude to a new national ergonomics standard. However, Harned said, if the agency pursues regulation in some form, it should make a stronger effort to engage small businesses in the discussion process.

Read more at the WORKERSCOMP ForumTM homepage.

May 13, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.