Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Opinion Not Amused

Haunted by the sight of his fellow Americans, a man ponders the value of soda taxes, or at least more clothing.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By CYRIL TUOHY, managing editor of Risk & Insurance®

Back in April, I trekked to a well-known New Jersey amusement park on Easter Sunday with my wife and daughter, about an hour away from my home in eastern Pennsylvania.

It was a splendid day, sunny and warm ... a perfect day to break in the spring season and introduce our growing 6-year-old to bigger, faster rides.

The day began pleasantly enough. Lines were few, the crowd relatively "thin."

As the day progressed, however, the tables began to turn. The sun grew stronger, the lines longer, the crowded lines "heavier." By the time we left, at 3 p.m., many of the park's patrons were a sight to behold--and forget.

Men were so heavily tattooed there wasn't much in the way of skin left to deface. Women were so inappropriately dressed, particularly for Easter Sunday, that I briefly considered going blind. And, of course, there were way, way too many people overweight.

It was all too much. We left the park and made it home only to turn on the evening news. Would you believe the lead story? A penny-an-ounce tax on soda proposed by city elders and the rabid opposition it had generated from Philadelphia residents.

The 2-cent-an-ounce tax, designed to raise tens of millions of dollars for public services in a city, like many others, suffering from the recession and deficits running in the hundreds of millions of dollars, was also aimed at curbing the consumption of sugared drinks.

Some on the City Council thought raising a few bucks while discouraging the consumption of soft drinks was a slam-dunk.

But the soda lobby and anti-tax activists made sure the proposal fizzled out, and the tax is not in the mayor's 2011 budget. It looks like, in Philadelphia at least, consumers are going to keep drinking sodas on the cheap and eating their fries too.

The recent defeat of the soda tax doesn't say much for strict consumer discipline, nor does it give us much hope in the nation's battle against obesity and high Body Mass Index metrics.

Why should we care? Ordinarily, many of us wouldn't give a hoot. But we should care because we pay the bill--all of us, fat and thin, young and old, rich and poor, black and white--through higher insurance premiums.

My health insurance premiums have just gone up by $96.00 a month, or just under 16 percent from the year-ago period, a percentage increase split between my employer and myself.

Now, in the height of summer, this same amusement park to which I referred above has opened its water park section. I've thought of going back to spend my remaining tickets. Fat chance; the thought is just too much to bear. We pay enough already.

August 1, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.