Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Test removes fraud investigators from scenario

Workers' comp insurers that suspect an employee may be committing fraud often hire a private investigator. Dr. Bradley A. Marcus, head of the Medical Rehabilitation & Kinematics Lab in San Diego, said this option can be very expensive, time consuming, and not achieve the desired outcome.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

"Investigators may take video of employee, but it won't measure everything," he said. "The data collected is subject to interpretation and does not always hold up in court cases. It can also cause animosity between parties because it is an invasive option that assumes guilt."

The kinematic functional capacity evaluation, on the other hand, removes many of those issues from the equation.

"That's the nice thing about what we do," Bradley said. "If you are only relying on videotape alone, you won't have that extra data to make an accurate assessment."

August 9, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.