Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Injury during preemployment test doesn't entitle applicant to WC

If a claimant is injured while taking a required test before actually being hired, she is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits even if the employer ends up hiring her.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Moberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Twining Village), No. 1767 C.D. 2009 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).

Ruling: The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board's denial of the claimant's claim petition.

What it means: If a claimant is injured while taking a test that is a requirement for being hired -- before actually being hired -- she is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits, even if the employer ends up hiring her.

Summary: The claimant asserted that as a condition of employment, she was required to have a tuberculin test. She alleged that after she had the test, she had an adverse reaction, fainted, and fell to the floor. She sought payment of her medical bills. The board denied her petition, concluding that she did not show that there was an employer/employee relationship at the time of the injury. Rather, she was a mere applicant. The claimant argued that she was hired for all intents and purposes prior to the date of the tuberculin test and that it was only a formality before she could actually begin working. The Commonwealth Court determined that the board did not err in finding that the claimant was not an employee at the time of her injury. The employer may not have hired her if she failed the tuberculin test or the drug test, or failed to satisfy any of the other requirements for employment.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

August 19, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.