Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Casino worker's delay blocks controversion petition

The Mississippi statute of limitations for petition to controvert applies when there has been no payment of disability income benefits or nonburial death benefits.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Pearson v. Lighthouse Point Casino, No. 2009-WC-00908-COA (Miss. Ct. App. 06/08/10).

Ruling: The Mississippi Court of Appeals held that an employee's petition to controvert filed more than two years after her injury and last medical treatment was barred by the statute of limitations.

What it means: The Mississippi statute of limitations for petition to controvert is two years and runs from the time of injury. The statute of limitations applies when there has been no payment of disability income benefits or nonburial death benefits.

Summary: A casino employee injured her head, neck, upper back and shoulders when a large piece of glass fell from the top of a slot machine. The casino paid for her visits to a hospital and medical clinic but did not pay for her visit to a chiropractor. The casino also did not pay temporary total disability benefits. More than two years after her injury, the employee filed a petition to controvert. The Mississippi Court of Appeals held that the two-year statute of limitations barred the employee's petition to controvert.

The employee argued that she was entitled to disability benefits and medical treatment for the two years after her injury. Since the employee did not file her petition to controvert for more than two years after her last medical treatment and she did not receive disability benefits, the court ruled that the two-year statute of limitations applied and barred her suit.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 13, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.