Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Circumstances show claimant, decedent were 'living with' each other

When a husband and wife dwell in separate houses for convenience or other reasonable motive without estrangement and with constant recognition of the marital tie, they can be found to be "living with" each other for purposes of establishing a claim for death benefits.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Williams, deceased v. Home Alert Management Co., 25 PAWCLR 104 (Pa. W.C.A.B. 2010).

Ruling: The Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Appeal Board upheld a workers' compensation judge's grant of the claimant's fatal claim petition.

What it means: When a husband and wife dwell in separate houses for convenience or other reasonable motive without estrangement and with constant recognition of the marital tie, they can be found to be "living with" each other for purposes of establishing a claim for death benefits.

Summary: The claimant's husband suffered fatal work-related injuries. The claimant and the decedent resided together until they were evicted from their apartment. Each temporarily moved in with their respective fathers. The claimant filed a fatal claim petition, alleging that she was totally dependent on the decedent for support at the time of his death. The WCJ granted the petition, finding that they were living together as a matter of law because they cohabited regularly on weekends, spent part of every day together, and were planning to move back in together when economics permitted. The WCJ also determined that the decedent was providing substantial support to the claimant by paying for her cell phone and a storage locker. The board concluded that the WCJ properly granted the claimant's fatal claim petition.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 13, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.