Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Medical Reigns

Workers' comp medical costs eclipsed indemnity costs for the first time since records were established. Or perhaps not and payers should stay focused on what matters most.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By DAN REYNOLDS, senior editor of Risk & Insurance®

Medical costs as a percentage of total workers' compensation wage replacement and medical spend have established a new landmark, at least according to one set of researchers.

Data from the Washington, D.C.-based National Academy of Social Insurance reveals that, in 2008, medical costs eclipsed wage replacement for the first time in the history of record keeping about workers' compensation spending, and it probably won't be the last time.

According to the researchers, $29.1 billion was spent on workers' compensation medical costs in 2008, and $28.6 billion was spent on workers' compensation wage replacement, or indemnity. That establishes a ratio of 50.4 percent medical and 49.5 percent indemnity.

"I think, given the long-term trend of the last 40 to 50 years, it seems that this is not going to slow down," said Ishita Sangupta, a workers' compensation research associate with the academy.

It is too early for the academy to project where medical spending is going in 2009, but Sangupta's hunch is that it will continue to increase as a percentage of total spending.

The academy has a database going back to 1960 that allows it to track workers' compensation spending. In the 1980s, for instance, according to Sangupta, medical spending as a percent of workers' compensation costs was around 29 percent.

The academy, which has more than 800 members, describes itself as a nonpartisan think tank dedicated to the study of social insurance. In addition to workers' compensation, it delves into such things as Social Security and employee benefits.

EYES OFF THE BALL?

Fran Flowers, a senior vice president with Lockton Insurance Brokers and the head of the company's risk control and claims services group, said that, while she agrees that constant increases in medical costs are a problem, they may be a distraction from that portion of the workers' comp claim that employers do have more control over: the degree to which effective return-to-work programs can improve the cost of the indemnity piece.

"They are taking their eye off of the ball and off of that part of the claim," Flowers said.

Flowers also took issue with the academy's claim that 2008 was the first year that medical workers' comp costs eclipsed indemnity costs. She said data from the National Council on Compensation Insurance indicates that medical workers' comp costs eclipsed indemnity costs as early as 1997.

But regardless of whose data you look at, these days, medical costs are increasing even as the number of covered workers decreases. The increase in medical costs from 2007 to 2008 was 8.8 percent, according to the academy, which represents the largest reported increase it recorded since 2001.

Carriers, payers, pharmacy benefits providers and third-party administrators are struggling to maintain cost controls, hobbled by a patchwork of state regulations and medical providers and pharmaceutical manufacturers that have proven skilled at circumventing state-regulated fee schedules.

Nationally, total workers' compensation spending was down in 2008 due to the drastic market correction and layoffs that struck the global economy that year. The number of covered workers in 2008 was 130,643,000, while the number of covered workers in 2007 was 131,734,000. Employers paid a total of $78.9 billion in workers' compensation costs in 2008, which represented a decrease of 6.7 percent from the previous year.

With medical spend and wage replacement in 2008 totaling $57.6 billion in 2008, the $21.3 billion difference in total spending was largely made up of workers' compensation premiums and the costs of self-insurance, Sangupta said.

September 20, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.