Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Seamstress may receive benefits for nonpermanent impairment

An injured worker who reopens her workers' compensation case for new medical treatment for a condition acknowledged by an ALJ may be entitled to benefits even if the condition was not assigned a permanent disability rating.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Palm Beach Co. v. Tartar, No. 2009-CA-002309-WC (Ky. Ct. App. 07/09/10, unpublished).

Ruling: In an unpublished opinion, the Kentucky Court of Appeals decided that a seamstress was entitled to benefits for a cervical condition even though the original administrative law judge only assigned permanent impairment to her carpal tunnel syndrome. The original ALJ acknowledged that she may have a work-related cervical condition.

What it means: An injured worker who reopens her workers' compensation case for new medical treatment for a condition acknowledged by an ALJ may be entitled to benefits even if the condition was not assigned a permanent disability rating.

Summary: A seamstress developed a knot in her right shoulder while pulling material through a sewing machine. She was diagnosed with a cervical condition and carpal tunnel syndrome. An ALJ assigned a permanent disability rating for her carpal tunnel syndrome and acknowledged that she may have had a cervical condition related to her repetitive activities at work. Years later, the seamstress sought treatment for her cervical condition, and her company disputed the treatment. The Kentucky Court of Appeals held that the seamstress was entitled to compensation because the cervical condition resulted from repetitive movement while working.

The company argued that only medical expenses related to the seamstress's permanent disability, carpal tunnel syndrome, were compensable. The court pointed to a Kentucky Supreme Court holding that when a claimant suffers a work-related impairment, the employer is liable for medical benefits even if the impairment does not rise to the level of permanent disability.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

September 27, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.