Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Work for private household precludes nursing assistant from receiving benefits

A domestic servant employed in a private home is specifically excluded from coverage by the Missouri workers' compensation law.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Massey v. Spasser, No. ED94060 (Mo. Ct. App. 07/13/10).

Ruling: The Missouri Court of Appeals held that a nursing assistant was ineligible for benefits because she was a domestic servant.

What it means: A domestic servant employed in a private home is specifically excluded from coverage by the Missouri workers' compensation law.

Summary: A certified nursing assistant was hired to provide care for a sick man in his home. She worked a set shift and was paid by the man and his wife. While attempting to move the man from his wheelchair to a recliner, the nurse's knees buckled, and she injured her back. The nurse underwent medical treatment and the man's wife refused to pay for her medical bills. The Missouri Court of Appeals held that the nurse was not entitled to workers' comp benefits.

Certain employees are excluded from coverage by the Missouri workers' compensation law. This includes domestic servants employed in a private home. The man and his wife argued that the nurse was a domestic servant employed in their private home. The court consulted a legal dictionary to define domestic servant as "a household servant" and a servant as "a person who is employed by another to do work under the control and directions of the employer." The court found that the nurse was under the control and directions of the man and his wife because she was formally interviewed, required to work a set shift, and paid by the man and his wife. The court noted that the workers' compensation law "was not intended to apply to work done in private homes to care for members of private households."

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

October 7, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.