Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Drug test irregularities, causation issue justify reasonable contest

Evidence that the claimant engaged in suspicious conduct regarding a post-accident drug test and changed his story regarding how his injury occurred supports a finding that the employer's contest of the claim was reasonable.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Savage v. Core Staff, Inc., 25 PAWCLR 12 (WCAB 06/18/10).

Ruling: The Workers' Compensation Appeal Board reversed in part and modified in part the workers' compensation judge's grant of the claimant's claim petition.

What it means: Evidence that the claimant engaged in suspicious conduct regarding a post-accident drug test and changed his story regarding how his injury occurred supports a finding that the employer's contest of the claim was reasonable.

Summary: The Workers' Compensation Appeal Board ruled that the workers' compensation judge erred in finding the employer presented an unreasonable contest to the claimant's claim petition. After reporting his injury and being informed that he would be required under company policy to take a drug test, the claimant changed his mind about requesting medical treatment. Additionally, the claimant allegedly failed to report promptly for the drug test, the urine specimen he provided had irregularities, and he refused to take a retest. The claimant reportedly admitted to the employer's staffing coordinator that he was not injured on the job. The board found that this evidence could have given the employer an affirmative defense to the claim petition. The board reversed the WCJ's award of unreasonable contest attorney's fees.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

October 11, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.