Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

For Carriers, a Ticking Time Bomb?

Carriers of two kinds--interstate motor carriers and insurance carriers--are looking at some big workers' comp challenges.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

By JOSHUA CLIFTON, a Chicago-based writer who covers workers' comp and disability issues

As it stands, cases applying California's cumulative trauma code have only been tried in professional sports.

Insurance experts believe, however, that the issue may only represent the tip of an iceberg.

The transportation, healthcare and airline industries--industries that employ transient workers in physically demanding jobs--may be more vulnerable than sports franchise owners, said Alex Fairly, senior vice president for insurance brokerage at Willis in Amarillo, Texas.

The California's workers' compensation statute could permit a truck driver who worked for a firm based in Oregon, but regularly drove shipments through California on his way to Texas, to file a cumulative trauma claim in state.

"Just look at the number of interstate truckers," said Timothy Peterson, a lawyer representing the Cincinnati Bengals and New Orleans Saints in a case against a former player. "This is where I see the real danger."

The only reason an attorney hasn't found a bunch of 80-year-old truckers to file claims is because the trucking industry isn't aware of the problem, Peterson said.

"If the trucker lives in Oregon and works for an Oregon-based company, why would the employer ever think it has a potential California problem?" Peterson said.

Should other industries begin filing claims, it could change California's workers' compensation landscape, Fairly said.

Insurance carriers are also vulnerable, because they haven't underwritten for the risk, said Peterson, partner with Peterson & Colantoni in Ladera Ranch, Calif.

"I believe it is so immeasurable that you couldn't even begin to put a number on it. And the thing is, you couldn't fix the problem even if you started today," Peterson said. "There is so much exposure out there and it's just waiting for someone to light the fuse."

November 1, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.