Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

The Woodman Case

The parental liability waiver has long been the accepted release form for an organization hosting activities for minors from day camp to travel sports, but a recent case in the Michigan Supreme Court could change all that.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

The case, Woodman v Kera LLC, involved a five-year-old child who broke his leg by falling off an inflatable slide at a birthday party held in a commercial Bounce Party facility.

The judges of the Michigan Supreme Court noted that a parent or guardian has no authority to bind his child by contract (absent special circumstances). A parental pre-injury waiver is a contract, and Michigan?s common law rule is that a minor lacks the capacity to contract for his or herself. The court also held that it is clear a minor cannot empower an agent or attorney to act for him or her in Michigan.

Read the Woodman decision for yourself.

November 1, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.