Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Failure to pay worker's benefits spells trouble for employer

An employer acts in bad faith when it knowingly or recklessly refuses to pay a claim without a reasonable basis, fraud, malice, oppression, or reckless disregard of the rights of a party.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Hernandez v. Dillards, Inc., No. 30,278 (N.M. Ct. App. 07/26/10, unpublished).

Ruling: In an unpublished opinion, the New Mexico Court of Appeals held that an employer acted in bad faith when it discontinued payments of a worker's benefits. The court increased the worker's benefits by 25 percent.

What it means: An employer acts in bad faith when it knowingly or recklessly refuses to pay a claim without a reasonable basis, fraud, malice, oppression, or reckless disregard of the rights of a party. When an employer knows a worker suffered from an aggravation of a preexisting injury due to a work-related incident and it refuses to pay benefits, the employer is acting in bad faith.

Summary: A dock worker fell while working and landed on his left side. He had a preexisting condition of severe osteoarthritis of his left hip. The fall aggravated this condition. The employer paid his medical bills and indemnity benefits for a period, but then ceased all payments. The worker filed an unfair claim practices and bad-faith claim against the employer. The New Mexico Court of Appeals held that the employer acted in bad faith, and it increased the worker's benefits by 25 percent.

Evidence showed that the employer was aware that the worker had been diagnosed with an aggravation of a preexisting condition as a result of his fall at work. The employer argued that the law requiring an employer to pay for the aggravation of a long-standing preexisting condition should be overturned. The court mentioned that it was bound by precedent. The court stated that the employer could have filed a claim to resolve the dispute while paying benefits under protest.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

November 4, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.