Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Flight attendant lands open award for knee condition

A hobby of woodworking might well create transferable skills. However, an interest in woodworking or "thinking about" woodworking as a future career does not create transferable skills.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Geoghegan v. Northwest Airlines, 24 MIWCLR 112 (Mich. W.C.A.C. 2010).

Ruling: The Michigan Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission affirmed the magistrate's decision granting an open award of benefits to the plaintiff, a flight attendant who alleged work-related bilateral knee conditions.

What it means: The hobby of woodworking, which might include knowledge of building cabinets and furniture and experience in using tools, might well create transferable skills. However, an interest in woodworking or "thinking about" woodworking as a future career does not create transferable skills.

Summary: The commission affirmed the magistrate's decision granting an open award of benefits to the plaintiff, a flight attendant who alleged work-related bilateral knee conditions. On appeal, the defendant claimed that the last-day-worked injury date of January 2005 was not a proper injury date. While the defendant correctly pointed out that the plaintiff suffered a specific event injury Sept. 10, 2004, which caused a left knee meniscal tear, both the lay and the medical testimony also supported a finding of a worsening of the knee condition through the last day of work. Next, the commission noted that although the plaintiff had preexisting congenital or developmental varus deformities of her knees that predisposed her to arthritic changes, the plaintiff's proof clearly established that her work caused medically distinguishable knee conditions and not a natural progression of the underlying condition.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

November 15, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.