Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Employers turn to post-offer testing to cut costs

If you've maxed out your managed care efforts, preinjury management might be the way to go.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Post-offer/pre-hire testing is not something to be taken lightly, explains Connie Miller, vice president of Colorado-based BTE Technologies Inc., a provider of advanced solutions for testing and rehabilitation. It is highly technical and highly regulated, but the results are often dramatic.

"It's a really good investment for employers who still see a lot of injuries, even if they are declining, or employers who see high severity musculoskeletal claims," Miller said. "The net return is typical in the first year -- often two to three times what they spend on the program, and that's highly conservative."

BTE develops individualized post-offer test protocols for its clients. "We take our own technology on-site to the employer, measure the physical demands of the job, and build the test protocol based on what is required for the essential functions of the job," Miller said.

The tests are part of a conditional offer of employment, similar to drug and alcohol screening. Typically, 15 to 20 percent of job candidates fail the post-offer tests.

"The job candidates who fail generally do not pass the job requirements for strength and endurance," Miller said. "Occasionally job candidates are unable to meet the cardiovascular requirements for test completion. Many times job candidates who present for testing are not aware they have a cardiac issue."

Miller says post-offer testing is a win for the employer and the applicant. "When injuries are prevented, the employee and employer both come out ahead. Many job candidates are not fully aware of the demands of a job at the time of application and simply may not be able to perform these functions," she said. "Turnover in the first few weeks of work due to heavy job requirements is often avoided."

Many companies have a policy allowing applicants to be retested after a certain period of time. So, for example, someone identified with a cardiac condition could submit to the post-offer test after seeking medical care.

Unlike drug testing, which aims to weed out substance abusers from the hiring pool, the goals of post-offer testing are to reduce the number of injuries and lower the severity. Often the process of developing the tests results in ergonomic changes that keep employees safer.

"When we analyze jobs to develop the test protocols, we identify ergonomic issues and solutions," Miller said. "Reducing the demands of job tasks with ergonomic intervention can reduce the job requirements necessary to perform the work."

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

November 29, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.