Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Asthma attack treated as accidental injury, not occupational disease

Alabama law treats asthmatic episodes and similar adverse reactions to one-time, work-related chemical exposure as accidental injuries.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Williams v. Valley View Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, No. 2090366 (Ala. Civ. App. 09/10/10).

Ruling: The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals held that the trial court improperly failed to consider a nurse's claim of accidental injury. The court sent the case back for further proceedings. A dissenting judge stated that the nurse's claim was for an occupational disease.

What it means: Alabama law treats asthmatic episodes and similar adverse reactions to one-time, work-related chemical exposure as accidental injuries.

Summary: A nurse suffered an asthma attack at work. She contended that she suffered a reaction to chemicals used to strip and wax the floors. She filed a complaint alleging that she sustained injuries due to the specific incident. The health center argued that the nurse could not recover workers' compensation benefits because she did not contract an occupational disease. The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals held that the trial court improperly failed to consider the nurse's claim of accidental injury. The court sent the case back to the trial court for further consideration of the claim.

The court found that the nurse had not claimed that she suffered from an occupational disease. She did not allege that she contracted asthma due to a long-term exposure to the working conditions in her employment. The court stated that asthmatic episodes due to one-time chemical exposure are treated as accidental injuries in Alabama.

The court noted that the nurse alleged that she provided the health center with notice of her injury, which was a requirement for accidental injuries but not for occupational exposure.

A dissenting judge stated that the nurse characterized her claim as an occupational disease and that she argued she suffered an accidental injury for the first time after her trial.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

December 6, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.