Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Benefits denied for injuries reported 3 months after accident

In Louisiana, when medical evidence does not causally relate injuries to a work accident, the injuries are not compensable.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Ashworth v. Administaff, Inc., No. 10-0318 (La. Ct. App. 10/06/10).

Ruling: The Louisiana Court of Appeal held that a merchandiser was not entitled to benefits for injuries to her neck, lower back, and shoulder.

What it means: In Louisiana, when medical evidence does not causally relate injuries to a work accident, the injuries are not compensable.

Summary: A merchandiser's job duties included traveling to stores serviced by her employer to deal with merchandising issues. While at a store, a 700-pound display containing eight shower doors that she was checking fell and pinned her to the floor. She suffered three fractures to her right ankle and underwent surgery. The merchandiser made no complaints of neck, back, or shoulder pain in the emergency room immediately after the accident. Her first recorded complaint of neck, lower back, and shoulder pain was in an orthopedic surgeon's records three months after the accident. The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied benefits to the merchandiser for her neck, lower back, and shoulder.

The merchandiser claimed that she began to have pain in her neck, shoulder, and lower back a couple of weeks after the incident. She stated that she told multiple doctors about the pain, but an orthopedic surgeon and physical therapist told her they were only allowed to treat her ankle and knee pain. However, the court noted that medical records did not support the merchandiser's claims that she told medical providers about her pain shortly after the accident. The court also stated that diagnostic studies did not show a work-related complaint in the areas, and multiple doctors opined that the injuries were not work-related.

The merchandiser also claimed that she should be entitled to penalties. The court agreed, finding that she was entitled to $2,000 in penalties based on her employer's failure to pay her indemnity benefits for a four-day period. The court noted that the workers' compensation judge did not address this failure in the judgment.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

December 20, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.