Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Sponsored bowling event strikes benefits for injured worker

In Iowa, recreational or social activities may be held in the course of employment when the employer benefits from the activities.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Gazette Communications, Inc. v. Powell, No. 0-633/10-0017 (Iowa Ct. App. 10/06/10).

Ruling: The Iowa Court of Appeals held that a worker was not entitled to compensation for an injury that occurred at a work-related bowling event.

What it means: In Iowa, recreational or social activities may be held in the course of employment when the employer benefits from the activities.

Summary: A worker was injured at a bowling event arranged by his employer's employee activity committee. The event was not held on the employer's premises and attendance at the event was not mandatory. A workers' compensation commissioner found that the injury arose out of and in the course and scope of his employment and was compensable. The Iowa Court of Appeals disagreed and held that the worker was not entitled to compensation for the injury.

A social activity arises out of the course of employment if the employer derives substantial direct benefit from the activity "beyond the intangible value of improvement of employee health and morale that is common to all kinds of recreation and social life." Here, the commissioner found the "sole benefit" to the employer was employee morale and camaraderie among the employees. The court stated that the factual finding was binding. The court explained that the commissioner was incorrect in deciding that this sole benefit was sufficient to bring the bowling event into the course of employment. To apply the standard used by the commissioner would result in complete coverage for all of the employer's social and recreational activities.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

December 20, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.