Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Claimant's facial scar warrants substantial disfigurement award

Under New York law, whether a claimant has suffered a serious facial or head disfigurement is a question of fact for the board to resolve.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Liberty Home Improvement and Tower Insurance Co. of NY, 110 NYWCLR 190 (N.Y. W.C.B., Panel 2010).

Ruling: A New York Workers' Compensation Board panel affirmed the workers' compensation law judge's finding that the claimant sustained a permanent facial disfigurement due to a laceration to his right cheek, thus warranting an award of $14,000.

What it means: Under New York law, whether a claimant has suffered a serious facial or head disfigurement is a question of fact for the board to resolve. Where the scar proceeds across the claimant's face, and the claimant's occupation involves soliciting bids and work cost estimates for projects, the claimant's scar would plainly affect his ability to solicit work and therefore would impact his future earnings.

Summary: The claimant, a 22-year-old canvasser for a home improvement company, was assaulted in a work-related incident and required 60 stitches from the top of his ear to his mouth. The panel affirmed the WCLJ's finding that the claimant suffered a permanent disfigurement due to the laceration, warranting an award of $14,000. The panel rejected the carrier's argument that the WCLJ did not take the claimant's testimony on whether he actually suffered a loss of income as a result of his facial scar. The claimant testified that his current occupation was to solicit bids and do cost estimates for residential home improvement projects. The panel found that the scar would plainly affect his ability to solicit work because the scar proceeded across the right side of his face. As a result, the scar would have an impact on the claimant's future earnings.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

December 20, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.