Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Transporting pizza supplies proves acting within scope of employment

In Ohio, a worker injured while transporting supplies for her employer is acting within the scope of her employment.

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Carter v. R&B Pizza Co., Inc., et al., No. 09 JE 34 (Ohio Ct. App. 12/06/10).

Ruling: The Ohio Court of Appeals held that a worker was acting within the scope of employment when she was injured by a drunk driver while she was transporting supplies for her employer.

What it means: In Ohio, a worker injured while transporting supplies for her employer is acting within the scope of her employment.

Summary: A worker who ran a pizza restaurant traveled to another state to meet with the restaurant's bookkeeper and to pick up supplies. She usually traveled twice a week to pick up supplies and once a month to meet with the bookkeeper. Upon arrival, the bookkeeper did not show up for their appointment. The worker called the restaurant to see if it needed any supplies immediately. The worker and her husband, who owned the restaurant, loaded her car with supplies such as pizza sauce, pepperoni, chicken wings, flour, and cheese. The worker planned on driving directly to the restaurant to refrigerate the perishable supplies. En route, a drunk driver crashed into her vehicle. The worker sought benefits. The Ohio Court of Appeals held that the worker was within the scope of her employment when the accident occurred.

The evidence included a picture of the worker's vehicle taken after the crash, which depicted the contents of her vehicle, including the supplies. The court noted that the evidence was not complicated and the restaurant only attempted to dispute the worker's credibility by raising questions as to whether anyone was running the restaurant while she was away and why she used an unreliable bookkeeper.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

January 17, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.