Search      Advanced Search | Browse By Topic
Magazine Content
Home
Features
Columnists
Industry Risk Reports
In-Depth Series
Special Reports
Point/Counterpoint
R&I One® Content
News & Analysis
Editor's Choice Stories
Resources and Tools
Power Broker® Directory
Risk InnovatorTM
Emerging Risks
Top Employee Benefits Consultant
Executives To Watch
Insights
Industry Events
WorkersComp Forum
Award Nominations
Webinars
RSS
R&I Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

R&I One®
WORKERSCOMP Forum TM Update
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Preferences

 

Status as nonemployee foils benefits for owner-operator of dump truck

To be eligible for second job wage loss benefits, a worker must be "employed by more than one employer."

Print Email Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to LinkedIn Write to the Editor Reprints

Case name: Davidson v. Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, No. SD30536
(Mo. Ct. App. 12/07/10).

Ruling: The Missouri Court of Appeals held that a worker was not entitled to second job wage loss benefits from the second injury fund.

What it means: To be eligible for second job wage loss benefits, a worker must be "employed by more than one employer." In Missouri, the owner-operator of a dump truck that is leased out for hire is not an employee of the trucking company and is not eligible to receive second job wage loss benefits.

Summary: A worker was the owner-operator of a dump truck, which he used to haul asphalt and building materials under a lease agreement with a trucking company. He was also a volunteer fireman. While responding to a fire call, the worker was injured when he fell onto some concrete blocks. His injuries left him unable to work for five weeks. After he settled his claim for workers' compensation with the fire protection district, he filed a claim against the second injury fund for second job wage loss benefits, based on income he would have earned operating his dump truck during the time he was unable to work. The Missouri Court of Appeals held that the worker was not entitled to second job wage loss benefits from the second injury fund because he was not "employed by more than one employer."

The worker argued that his status as an employee was established by his primary injury status as a fireman, which did not preclude second job wage loss benefits. In a matter of first impression, the court disagreed, calling the worker's argument "dubious." According to state workers' compensation law, the worker was not an employee of the trucking company in his capacity as the owner-operator of the dump truck, which he leased. He could not have received workers' compensation benefits for an injury he suffered while driving his dump truck. The court noted that no evidence showed that the trucking company had any employees or had purchased workers' compensation insurance.

Read more at the WorkersComp Forum homepage.

January 27, 2011

Copyright 2011© LRP Publications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK logo
 

Back to top

Entire contents copyright © 2013 Risk and Insurance® All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission.